When the Christian claims to know my thoughts better than I do, his credibility goes out the window. My own thoughts are the one thing I am uniquely positioned to know. This earns applause in an echo chamber but further justifies the non-belief of a skeptic.
Looks like yet another case of no-true-Christian infighting and doctrinal integrity FAFO leading to professional apologetics cowardice when the offering plate can't cover the new 5-figure studio.
Someone described me as, "Knowledgeable enough to be credible, casual enough to be watchable, dry enough to sting." It's my new favourite review.
Today is last day for EARLY BIRD pricing for the New Insights into the Hebrew Bible conference!! Dan McClellan, Joel Baden, Megan Lewis and MORE! This link helps the channel - paulogia--ehrman.thrivecart.com/nihb-2026-st...
THEISTS! Should I believe what you believe? Am I wrong about some aspect of Christianity? Please call tonight and tell me. I'm ready to be corrected. www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bJ3...
If anyone stops believing in Christ, there is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!
If heaven appeared on a ballot as an economic system — universal provision, no markets, no private wealth, single central authority — many Christians would campaign against it.
Well, I'm pretty clear in the video I'd rather Christianity fade away than be fixed.
When a case is winning on the merits, it doesn’t need “God says.”
Sounds like something that a someone passing off human words as divine words would say.
From Westerns to action movies to cop shows, the most celebrated hero in American stories is the vigilante who doesn’t follow the rules. We’ve spent generations practicing what it feels like to applaud the end of due process.
Tonight is your chance to explain to me live why the Bible is reliable and should be believed. I promise that my mind will be open. You could bring me back to the Kingdom! Ask the Holy Spirit for words. www.youtube.com/watch?v=Od9n...
If there is a god, he's written no books.
It is my job to continually explain myself to those who are committed to misunderstanding me.
Biologists know this would instantly disprove biological evolution. Creationists think this would prove evolution. 🤦♂️
The gospels are not independent stories that can corroborate each other, rather they are works of plagiarism with some tweaks for differing theological emphasis.
A skeptic need not explain alternate causes for particular details of Bible stories. A skeptic need explain only why someone might write such a detail.
It was nine years ago this former Christian started looking at the claims of Christians. I cannot thank you enough for helping me on this mission.
wow! thank you
These are Gemini's key takeaways from my Paulogetics series. Not terrible.
I can't believe Wes Huff is still peddling the misconception that cosmologists think "something came from nothing", when he's the embodiment of a hot, dense state. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMKw...
CHRISTIANS - here's a LIVE chance to explain to me why I'm wrong to disbelieve Christianity. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATVc...
For an upcoming video, I called a book title "Lawrence Krauss' biggest mistake." I'm glad I had time to change that phrasing before recording.
False dichotomy. The third, and vastly more likely option, is that you never experience anything after this life. One minute after you die it will be 60 seconds since you had your last thought.
Social Media - Transgender was invented in 2015.
Jesus, Gospel of Thomas, 140 AD - “I myself shall make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.”
If there are no former Christians, then all the people whom I have helped leave belief were never really Christians, so I'm not doing Jesus any harm.
Today's video was one of those videos.
Yes, it would falsify the axioms as non-axiomatic in our "universe" (or "situation", as you phrased it)... not all possible universes.
I'm confused. Logical rationale can apply to any situation -- physical, abstract, hypothetical. Empirical simply means observation. Are you asking if logic can be observed?
