Lugh

Why does the Moon have clouds? I don't think AI has any idea what the Moon looks like. It certainly got it wrong here!

Do we really need AI to do this?!?

Which is "Earth", the foreground or the background? Whatever the answer, what is the other?

It's funny that the horns on her head don't turn when she turns her head. Oh, and that they change sizes.

That looks like a "frame" for a quote, saying, joke, or some cute wording in the middle.

Yup, we see it too! 😢

Well, he can't have anyone smarter than him around him! That's a REALLY low bar to find people to work for him.

Pretty, but has typical AI flaws. Mostly it's the light. The setting Sun is back and to the right, but the light on the waves is coming from above.

This doesn't look anything like an eclipse and it's a weird Aurora. To me it looks like a bad AI image, but Gemini AI says it's a real photo - as described.

Insane alright! The Moon as a dot?!? How can you tell if it's in an eclipse or not? That aurora is even weirder! AI really got this one crazy!

The white makes the painting seem brighter - a tad.

I haven't seen very many of his painting live, but I have seen a few. It's an eye opener to do so! People think they are just rectangles painted on a background, but there is way more subtlety in them than I expected. If you ever get the chance, study his painting up close in real life.

I fully agree! However our President lies so much that I don't think he could tell the truth, even under oath in a court.

Definitely not a Rothko, but I like the tribute to him in your own way!

Testing out the new Alexa AI to see how good it was with the concept of abstract art... "Take the old song "Old McDonald Had a Farm" and translate it into multi color lines, swirls, twists, and other painterly movements. Put into one painting that has action, balance, and rhythm."

I've learned a lot of that through trial and error. This article is right on point!

Subtle abstract!!! We don't see that very often! Cool!

Not abstract, but still beautiful.

Why are the big rocks in the lower part of the picture completely different in the two pictures? I suspect that AI wasn't paying attention. Nothing in nature would make those differences in a change of two seasons.

I would think that running with a top like that would be energetic and entertaining, but might get a bit sore.

Something red flowing from that area is a bit funny and out of context a bit.

Well, that's my point. Why use a moving medium for something that doesn't move. Actually it was confusing; my thought was "what's wrong with this video?" That took away the focus on the art and focus on what looks like a screwed up presentation.

Just audio, no video!

Who burnt the hotdogs?!?

I stopped scrolling and looked at this for a bit. Then I move on. However, it stuck in my head and I had to scroll back to it. I'm still not sure why, but it clicks something in my mind.

It looks like "Almost Many Things", but not quite anything.

Not very abstract at all, but it really looks like it would make a very nice wallpaper in the right place.

So much for freedom of the press.