20 years ago I started teaching a Masters course on Soil and greenhouse gases with a mitigation focus. Naturally I show a graph of global temperatures each year in the first lecture. Depressingly looks like the temperature has increased by more than 0.5 C since I started teaching. #weneedtodobetter
23.02.2026 01:35
๐ 3
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
There is a grand piano at the front the lecture theatre where I am going lecture on soil management. For some reason, this makes me happy. Note: I have no skills with music other than an eclectic taste.
I am hoping one of the students can play to warm up the crowd.
20.02.2026 04:29
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
These US states want polluters to pay for the rising insurance costs of climate disasters
Proposals by California, Hawaii and New York lawmakers aim to hold fossil fuel industry accountable for soaring rates
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026...
We are having problems renewing home coverage. Forced to add home security & water turnoff meter (> $2k) just to renew. Alternative coverage would be $12k
The atmosphere should not be a free sewer. Time to internalize these externalities.
09.02.2026 03:42
๐ 22
๐ 7
๐ฌ 0
๐ 1
Visiting academic to address spread of misinformation
For Carl Bergstrom, misinformation is like a living organism โ it can travel across networks and spread through populations like pathogens. The...
Landing in Dunedin Aotearoa in about 90 minutes for the start of a trip that represents the culmination of a dream Iโve had since I was ten years old.
04.02.2026 23:43
๐ 521
๐ 44
๐ฌ 28
๐ 0
I am coming down to your office to see these!
04.02.2026 19:31
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Nearby there are government agencies with a focus on land and environment that offer potential for collaboration. Not far away are remarkable pristine indigenous ecosystems and the role of their soils in sustaining these systems also deserves more attention.
27.01.2026 19:53
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
The University sits in the middle of some of New Zealand's most productive agricultural land and there are opportunities to think about how to balance production with consequences on the environment.
27.01.2026 19:53
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Tom Roa smiles on the pae.
Ngฤ mihi nui to our treasured Kaumฤtua Professor Tom Roa (Ngฤti Maniapoto, Waikato, Ngฤti Apakura), who has been made a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit ๐งต
31.12.2025 01:54
๐ 23
๐ 8
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.
1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.
A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.
1. The four-fold drain
1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishersโ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authorsโ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
โossificationโ, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchersโ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices โ such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with othersโ contributions โ is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.
A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:
1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.
The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing:
a ๐งต 1/n
Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820
Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
11.11.2025 11:52
๐ 642
๐ 453
๐ฌ 8
๐ 66
Another way NZ resembles Ireland
04.12.2025 19:29
๐ 3
๐ 2
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Also excited to be chatting about this tonight on www.rnz.co.nz/national/pro... - around 8.05/8.10pm if you're keen to tune in ๐ธ๏ธ๐ธ๏ธ๐ธ๏ธ
31.10.2025 01:48
๐ 1
๐ 1
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
I had to read this twice, what?
14.10.2025 06:40
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Good Lord!
14.10.2025 05:15
๐ 11
๐ 6
๐ฌ 0
๐ 2
Scientists fear weaker methane target signals wider retreat from climate action
After cutting methane targets, New Zealand has a choice: shoulder the burden at huge cost - or cause more warming to the planet.
"Agriculture and Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay said the government had worked closely with industry and accepted a range of advice to determine a "practical target"."
Imagine a business setting a "practical target" rather than success and being ambitious
www.rnz.co.nz/news/nationa...
13.10.2025 04:32
๐ 7
๐ 1
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Applications for @ipcc.bsky.social AR7 Chapter Scientists close on 18th October. Great opportunity for emerging researchers from developing countries! ๐งช๐๐ฑ
08.10.2025 21:52
๐ 4
๐ 6
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Every year, the Ig Nobel Prizes honor the weirdest and most wonderful science out thereโlike studying how drunk bats fly or the physics of perfect pasta. Itโs all real research, and itโs all hilariously brilliant. Because sometimes science makes you laughโฆ then think.
๐ค๐ฅ๐๏ธ@tomlumperson.bsky.social
02.10.2025 20:43
๐ 186
๐ 41
๐ฌ 6
๐ 5
Climate action can feel slow โ but the fastest energy leap in history has begun
Weaning ourselves off fossil fuels is glacially slow โย isnโt it? This pessimistic narrative doesnโt stack up against evidence of very rapid change in the real world.
It feels slow not because of facts, but because the doom-narrative drowns out reality. ๐ The truth: solar doubled from 1,000 โ 2,000 TWh in just 3 yrs, windโs surging too. Fossils took decades. The fastest energy leap in history is hereโdonโt let fear blind you. โก๐ #EnergyTransition #BESS #EVs #LFP
13.09.2025 01:19
๐ 947
๐ 321
๐ฌ 25
๐ 13
Fewer Marsden Fund grants after government cuts
A major research fund has been forced to slash its grant allocation by more than $20 million next year.
More cuts to the Marsden Fund. This time $20 million from the annual budget cut starting next year. This is on top of previous cuts by this government. They are trying to skip the 'priming the pump' step of public research as a driver of the economy. How well that is going to work?
#NZPOL
06.09.2025 20:48
๐ 45
๐ 24
๐ฌ 5
๐ 8
On behalf of the Netherlands, Iโm sorry for all the whales that are killed by our windmills throughout the centuries. ๐ฌ๏ธ
26.08.2025 21:09
๐ 97
๐ 22
๐ฌ 2
๐ 1