mckinsey egg price gouging specialist

The Power Broker II: Now As Farce

how bout them GaaS prices

That's potentially another layer beyond the need to insure ship crew and cargo

Does anyone know what the liability implications of a spill under these circumstances are like for tanker operators?

SHARON NO

They just took this and drew a new line on it for incoming shaheds

Remember, it can only good happen

Someone tell Kristi she has to return the counter fentanyl laser before she leaves the building

isn't there someone you forgot to ask meme and it's just the Noble European Farmer

At this rate we're not going to field anything until the mid 30s

God hates us

one big beautiful bill act actually you missed a B

Like this is a pretty radical proposition however you package it

You would still need engineering resources from the primes and would probably end up with services contracts to support those new public facilities! And it would be so duplicative you'd be better up breaking up some of them and forcing nationalization of key facilities anyway

It's fine it's fine we just need a couple CIA guys and some JTACs to help out our new favorite kurds

this post was chiang kai-sheked by real kuomintang patriots

sounds like NED's shadier cousin

mr bessent, i served with Steve mnuchin. steve mnuchin was a friend of mine. you're no Steve mnuchin.

Rudy Giuliani will prevent this through his MEK ties don't worry

Yeah you can really trace most of the original sins of the cold war on our side directly to Eisenhower

and it's tom clancy territory, but the russians do love their tom clancy shit

yeah though if the threat model is orbital nuke designed to fill the space between the van allen belts with charged particles and cook everything then it could affect the entire orbit

we call this the "firebombing a pottery barn" doctrine

And importantly Iraq was legal within the narrow confines of US constitutional law, this is plainly not

Time to consider that philosophers with a rosy view of human nature have been empirically disproven

Eric is very good at cutting to the heart of why something is stupid

Upon reflection you're right "device determining its role in an engagement" is a better way to think about this and I'm just muddying the waters here

Well I suppose your point is he takes that as an absolution, but I don't

and using "well it's a magic talking trashcan we don't know how it works" is just as pathetic a dodge as "well we didn't think about what 0.1% submunition dud rate meant at scale" or whatever