Doh! Sorry. Sometimes I make some mental tradeoff and skip alt text on purpose but this time I just forgot.
@daphnek
Director of Platform Regulation, Stanford Law School LST Program. Former Google (2004-2015) Legal Director for Web Search, Speech and Intermediary Liability Issues. May be cranky. https://law.stanford.edu/daphne-keller/
Doh! Sorry. Sometimes I make some mental tradeoff and skip alt text on purpose but this time I just forgot.
Ignore if you are tired of hearing what's going on on X.
I go periodically to look at stuff, but am not active enough for real notifications. So today, right at the top of notifications, I got this loathsome garbage.
For that matter Iβm pretty sure @rollingstone.com was, for a while during Trumpβs first term, doing the best reporting out there about him pressuring social media companies to take content down.
Iβm happy to subscribe all the same
tech journalism is a complicated category these days
I like this one. Partly bc hearing Pharrell Williams in rage mode is a good reminder that artists contain multitudes.
youtu.be/vYPIOaqNlyg?...
100%
I came to it via DJ Shadow and can only take so much RTJ at any given time. But this is the perfect combo.
I donβt think I have it in me to grift, but I bet I could be a great monster if I really tried.
The people at @wired.com are kicking ass. The people at @404media.co and @techdirt.com and @theverge.com are, too.
We should all be subscribing, donating, or in other ways GIVING THEM MONEY if they ask for it and we have it to give. Same goes for so many other journalists and news sources.
I found him to be a perfectly nice young man.
share.google/rnhwT2jpMcfX...
Amazing. This is why you need the DMA. App developers shouldn't have to make deals written by Rumpelstiltskin to be able to effectively distribute on Big Tech platforms.
www.theverge.com/news/889595/...
βthe bear is only a baby, but at the same time, itβs a bearβ β this guy is basically describing YOU @natecardozo.bsky.social.
βwritten by Rumpelstiltskinβ is π€
The genius annotation on this song is amazing.
Since I have had this song in my head for like two months now, I would rephrase the little-known fact as βI will punch a baby bear in his shitβ
youtu.be/NUC2EQvdzmY?...
Probably not what youβre asking for but the last pic I took and zen by some definitions.
I believe my class slide called this βasset seizure with Austrian characteristicsβ and contrasted it with βasset seizure with Brazilian characteristicsβ aka taking money from Starlink to punish X.
We all owe SO much to John Peel
Heard of it enough to name check and then move on, apparentlyβ¦
Exactly what I told my students to do!
Quoted alongside the great @daphnek.bsky.social, @klonick.bsky.social, and @hutko.bsky.social in this Financial Times piece on 'The transatlantic battle over free speech' - www.ft.com/content/37d4... via @financialtimes.com
Actually I think maybe their assertions of state power killed HavenCo, but I can't recall exactly. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HavenCo
They don't believe in it, so no?
I would bet that @jtlg.bsky.social's textbook is good, but what I used this year is below.
I do tend to move pas this part very very fast.
The gambling industry always gets there first
One more time, for the visual learners!
Yahoo! France Real Lessons Countdown Lesson #3: If you can geotarget ads, that makes it hard to tell national courts that you canβt geotarget legal compliance.
Lesson #2: U.S. Courts only examine First Amendment issues if someone is asking that U.S. government enforcement power be used.* * All things can change, but this is how Y! cases, Equustek, SPEECH Act, and earlier non-Internet cases work.
Lesson #1: What really ended the dispute was Yahoo!βs βvoluntaryβ decision to change their Terms of Service, bringing their private rules more into alignment with French law.
Yahoo France according to me.
A less principled counsel would have just done it.
I love teaching Internet jurisdiction.
Ohhhhhh yeah. That makes sense.