Billy Juggernaut Antifa

They can’t get any artists to perform. Haha.

When I said the law isn’t black what matters you said that morals do. That was literally what you argued. Now you’re trying backtrack. You’re fucking dumb. You don’t like the facts so you argue some other ridiculously dumb shit. “Boo hoo. What I think is fair should be what the law is.” Pussy.

But we’re talking about the law. You brought up morals you fucking moron. You’re pushing for morality (yours I presume) to be the law. That’s what you’re saying should be applied in these cases. Morals and the law don’t belong together, I’ve given examples of why, and you move the goalposts.

Haha. You’re a fucking idiot. You’re a pseudo intellectual jackass. You’re dumb, and too dumb to know it. “I’ve gone back in time in my head and I know exactly what you would have supported.” I’ve made it clear that I don’t always support the law, but it’s the law, you dumb, ignorant motherfucker

Laws don’t care about morals. What’s immoral to you may not be to me. You want morality police? No drinking, no premarital sex, banning certain music, being gay is illegal? There’s plenty of people that have those as morals. You want those to be the law?

You seem a bit narcissistic and delusional. You seem to think that whatever you believe is the way everyone should believe. That somehow you’re the ultimate voice.The law is in these situations. I’m sure there’s even some cases brought that wouldn’t agree with. You’d rather be right than honest

Again, the law isn’t black and white. If the administration put people on trial and they were found guilty then it was illegal. That’s it. The organization, or you, or me, can have a different opinion, but they don’t mean anything. The law is what ultimately matters.

I’ll use slavery as an example. It was legal. It was also wrong. Jim Crow laws. Anti abortion laws. “Right to work” laws can be horrible. You could be fired in many states for having a Kamala for President bumper sticker on your car. That’s wrong. It’s also legal. So yeah, it’s not about right/wrong

I looked at them all. One was an oped. The other two were whistleblower organizations. Both are reputable. Both make arguments as to what THEY consider whistleblowing. Fine. It only matters what the law says.

There are plenty of things that aren’t illegal and also are unethical.

Obama did things I didn’t agree with either, but if asked if those things were illegal I’d have to say no. You want to make it about your personal feelings instead of the facts. You trying to claim I’m a sheep is just stupid. trump does a lot of things I don’t like. Many are illegal, some aren’t.

What you may want to call whistleblowing, and I may want to as well, the law could consider leaking. It’s not as black and white as you’re trying to make it out to be. It’s not always simple. The law is a complex thing. Quit trying to oversimplify for the sake of an agenda.

No. Not quiet. Whistleblowing and leaking are not the same thing. You want them to be to suit your agenda. You’re conflating the two for an obvious reason. There are laws to deal with each. Sometimes we may not like the law, but laws aren’t necessarily about right or wrong.

Prior to trump’s epstein files war with Iran, America was under no imminent threat from Iran. Now, we are. trump is literally the imminent threat.

Mark my words, the state department will try to take credit for getting Americans out of the Middle East

The only hope is for trump’s donor class to step in and threaten to cut off the money.

There wasn’t an expected loss of 50,000. It was an expected gain.

And I wasn’t sealioning. I asked for an example, which you clearly can’t provide, so instead you use an ad hominem attack.

Obama didn’t prosecute anyone. He didn’t control the DOJ. He didn’t tell them who to prosecute.

So no example?

Can you give me an example? I realize there can be a fine line at times, but there always is with the law.

Mental illness

Hey guess what, not leaking! That’s not whistleblowing.

They don’t care about veterans.

The gaslighting is hilarious. It’s so transparent. “When trump said he was the jobs president I think people thought he meant he would create them. He didn’t, he meant he would eliminate them.”

Poor payroll reports are all part of the plan. When he said he was “the jobs president” he didn’t mean that they would be created. He meant there wouldn’t be many.

This isn’t an answer. It doesn’t even make sense. You can’t be older than 15.

So did this include increasing the financial rewards for whistleblowers? He did crackdown on classified information leakers, but not whistleblowers.

Payrolls are negative over the last 6 months. At what point would you consider it serious? Not destroyed necessarily, but moving in that direction.

I was just posting about this. It’s not currently awful, but it’s not that great either. With trump though (and republicans having both chambers of congress) it’s a matter of when, not if, the economy crumbles. He’s a chaos agent. He’s incapable of listening to people smarter than him

We knew it was a matter of time before trump fucked up the economy. It was a matter of when, not if. Currently it’s not awful, but it’s not very good either. It will get much worse though.