Eileen Ormsby's Avatar

Eileen Ormsby

@eiley

Writer. Mostly about the Dark Web eileenormsby.com

294
Followers
19
Following
52
Posts
13.05.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Eileen Ormsby @eiley

This is super interesting. I remember at the Allwine trial being gobsmacked this guy gave evidence about a Bitcoin address and had no idea what he was talking about. If the defence had called their own expert he would have been torn to shreds

06.04.2025 06:52 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Say NO to swasticars

21.02.2025 01:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Love how media are calling kidnappings of crypto holders being forced to transfer under threat of violence 'Wrench Attacks' - this XKCD cybersecurity classic finally going mainstream πŸ‘‡

13.02.2025 04:22 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Drug bazaars, hitmen and hackers β€” why Eileen went deep into the dark web - ABC listen Lawyer turned journalist Eileen Ormsby on her journey deeper and deeper into the internet's 'evil twin', where, under the cloak of anonymity, people sell buy and share anything a person is willing to ...

A great hour-long chat about all things Dark Web with Richard Fidler
www.abc.net.au/listen/progr...

06.02.2025 11:08 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
From the SilkRoad community on Reddit Explore this post and more from the SilkRoad community

I have set up a reddit thread on the r/silkroad sub to combat misinformation and provide people with facts about all facets of Silk Road
www.reddit.com/r/SilkRoad/c...

03.02.2025 04:00 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

You definitely look more graceful in there than I ever did! πŸ˜‚

31.01.2025 03:10 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I stopped being excited about it. Couple of dead de facto partners didn't help. I hear it is much safer nowadays though.

I found the tunnel fun, but a whole different way of flying. Did you take it up for a particular reason?

30.01.2025 22:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Around 800 jumps back in the day, but only tried the tunnel a couple of times

30.01.2025 21:20 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Do you jump Runa?

30.01.2025 20:32 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

This offer is still open. Please, STOP with the misinformation

30.01.2025 03:47 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Please stop with the misinformation. Silk Road sold drugs. It never sold child porn or assassins. Weapons were very short-lived before the community voted to ban them.

Silk Road's rules stated 'you may sell anything the purpose of which is not to harm or defraud another person'

30.01.2025 03:45 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

A murder is a personal service. People who order hits rarely want more than one. Therefore, as the whole idea of the dark web is the anonymity it offers, what possible incentive does a "hitman" have for carrying out the hit once they have the #bitcoin?

30.01.2025 03:43 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

There has never been a genuine murder-for-hire site and likely never will be. It doesn't make sense as a business model.

People who buy drugs are repeat customers, so the sellers provide good service and quality product to keep their customers coming back. Drugs are also easily sent in the mail
./3

30.01.2025 03:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Darknet markets have run continuously since Silk Road shut down. Many of them dwarfed Silk Road in size, and added things like stolen credit cards and personal information to the items you could buy. The current market leader is many times larger than Silk Road.

.../2

30.01.2025 03:43 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

How many suckers will they get?

29.01.2025 06:10 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Also, the 69,370 bitcoin was only last month released by SCUSA to the USG to be sold, after years of various whackjobs trying to convince the DOJ they had a claim on the coins. Not sold yet.

28.01.2025 19:50 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Great piece, but the author @gregolear.bsky.social conflates two stories - the theft of Silk Road Bitcoin by Force and Bridges and the hack of 69,370 Bitcoin by 'Individual X'. This was the #bitcoin that Ross Ulbricht gave up his right to claim upon in order to wipe his debt. X is not Force/Bridges

28.01.2025 19:49 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

The misinformation isn't helping anyone. Silk Road sold drugs. CSAM, murders for hire were explicitly banned.

28.01.2025 19:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Any others you can think of that I can add to the list?

28.01.2025 19:36 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Tying up Silk Road’s loose ends: Redandwhite - Eileen Ormsby The Silk Road saga continues with the indictment of James Ellingson, known by numerous aliases on the platform, most famously as 'redandwhite'. But is he

3. James Ellingson, the man accused of being "redandwhite" aka "lucydrops" aka MIMM is due to face a 3-day extradition hearing next month. Among other things, it is alleged he scammed Silk Road out of around $750K by taking "hits" out on 5 people who didn't exist
eileenormsby.com/2023/05/19/t...

28.01.2025 19:36 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Silk Road Defense Claims Another Corrupt Agent at Large Trying to overturn a life sentence, Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht’s attorneys now claim to have unearthed evidence of a third crooked agent to bolster their argument that admitted corruption by two ...

2. There is still another rogue USG / LE agent who has not been identified. 'alpacino' was initially thought to be another 'nym of Carl Mark Force, but that name was quietly dropped from his indictment
www.courthousenews.com/silk-road-de...

28.01.2025 19:36 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
United States v. Approximately 69,370 Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin Gold (BTG) Bitcoin SV (BSV) and..., 3:20-cv-07811 - CourtListener.com Docket for United States v. Approximately 69,370 Bitcoin (BTC), Bitcoin Gold (BTG) Bitcoin SV (BSV) and..., 3:20-cv-07811 β€” Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high ...

1. last month the USG was given the go-ahead by the courts to sell off the 69,370 #bitcoin (~$7bn) seized from "Individual X" who stole it from Silk Road in 2013. We still don't know who Individual X is.
www.courtlistener.com/docket/18607...

28.01.2025 19:36 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Things that are still ongoing in the Silk Road Saga. A thread:

28.01.2025 19:36 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Two days later, a similar post appeared on a Bitcointalk .org thread "A Heroin Store".

Bitcoin was $0.42.

Silk Road was born. And the rest is history.

28.01.2025 19:31 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

On January 27 2011, a new forum member calling themselves β€˜altoid’ registered on the Shroomery forums and wrote a message that would change the face of drug dealing and cryptocurrency forever.
#bitcoin #silkroad #RossUlbricht

28.01.2025 19:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

US lawyers: The USG effectively agreed to deem Ross Ulbricht’s civil penalty paid in full in return for forfeiting any claim to the 69,370 BTC that 'Individual X' stole from Silk Road.

But if Ulbricht has been completely pardoned, doesn't that mean the civil penalty is voided?

22.01.2025 13:33 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

No, just correcting misinformation when I see it.

When it came to weapons, they WERE offered for sale for a short time, until a huge debate ensued about whether weapons were items 'the purpose of which was to harm another person' thus against the site's rules. Consequently banned from sale

22.01.2025 13:04 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I'm not sure what you're saying here. It's not an argument, it is a fact.

People are making all sorts of wild claims about what was sold on Silk Road. I'm just stating the facts

22.01.2025 12:55 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

It's true he tried to engage a hitman, but he was never successful. Hits were never offered on the site

22.01.2025 12:43 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

It was primarily a drug market. The discussion about organs was a philosophical one - none were ever offered for sale. Hits were never offered. Weapons allowed for a few months until the community voted to ban them. The site's rule was nothing 'the purpose of which is to harm or defraud another'

22.01.2025 12:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0