New article is live! Part of a special issue on Representation in the Neurosciences and AI, all of which looks really interesting!
philosophymindscience.org/index.php/ph...
New article is live! Part of a special issue on Representation in the Neurosciences and AI, all of which looks really interesting!
philosophymindscience.org/index.php/ph...
Highlights from last Friday's Coffee & CAIC with @coreymaley.net
Last week, I was invited to give the Spring Convocation Keynote at St. Bonaventure University. I spoke on the topic of "Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence."
This moment is an opportunity to think carefully about what is valuable about education and why.
New paper βStructural Representation is Analog Representationβ forthcoming!
philsci-archive.pitt.edu/27929/
I'm really proud of my involvement in this project, shaping the concept of the Dana watch, selecting 12 numeral signs from across the world, and historical consultation. A great gift for lovers of writing systems, mathematics, archaeology, and language!
www.kickstarter.com/projects/dan...
Thatβs really cool!
Day 4 of the Brain's Blog symposium of 'The Idealized Mind'. Attached are links to @coreymaley.net commentary and my response:
philosophyofbrains.com/2025/12/04/c...
philosophyofbrains.com/2025/12/04/a...
Am I committed to there being no physical computers that compute?
π NEW PUBLICATION: The mind-brain is a computer, but what is (neural) computation? By @coreymaley.net & Oron Shagrir
Out now in: Neurocognitive Foundations of Mind π§
Find it here: www.routledge.com/Neurocogniti...
Trump Says Broadcasters Should Lose Licenses for Criticizing Him
This is the lead story in the New York Times. If you're in the business of communicating, whether through journalism, commentary, or art, this is the five-alarm fire. People are going to remember who spoke up and who stayed conveniently silent or postured about "neutrality."
βοΈ 2 publications out in the current issue of Mind & Language π Both engage the concept of 'medium independence.' @okaydaniellle.bsky.social argues that different concepts are being thrown around & @coreymaley.net argues we should get right of MI altogether: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/14680017...
These words by Michael Schwalbe counter any notion that academic freedom is a niche or quaint concern.
We come at this from different points, but I completely agree! Hereβs a pretty brief, broad-strokes paper on my take:
www.frontiersin.org/journals/com...
I like this paper, but I take issue with how they apply Marrian terms to the different levels. What theyβre doing is more βzooming inβ at a particular Marrian level than moving from one Marrian level to another. I wrote about that here:
link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Youβre so welcome Brett. You deserve the best.
Zoe Drayson says βyesβ:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
I say βnoβ:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
And Danielle Williams says βit depends on what you meanβ:
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Read all about it!
Is computation necessarily independent of its physical implementation? Now thereβs a whole symposium on this question in the journal Mind & Language!
New paper is live! Itβs part of a symposium with Danielle Williams and Zoe Drayson. Itβs open access, so you can actually read it.
doi.org/10.1111/mila...
Iβm excited to read this!
Great talk by Danielle Williams (@okaydaniellle.bsky.social) at SPAN (@socphilneuro.bsky.social). on the historical context in which computing and computational concepts were introduced into neuroscience.
The 1st Society for Philosophy & Neuroscience @socphilneuro.bsky.social meeting was outstanding! I'm so sorry I have to miss the last day. Thanks to the organizers for putting together such an amazing lineup - great to see so many folks working at the intersection.
Great, reflective talk by Joe LeDoux at @socphilneuro.bsky.social
BREAKING: NSF has frozen all grant funding, as of yesterday. It's unclear when they will resume funding awards, or why the pause has been put in place. www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Usually when I read an academic paper that seems like itβs making a really stupid point, I give the author(s) the benefit of the doubt and check to see whether maybe itβs meβnot themβwhoβs missing something. Because who knows? Maybe *Iβm* wrong, and I can actually learn something.
So did you eat the microphone? Or did it really just absorb into your face? π
It doesnβt take much for a system to be interpretable as implementing all TM-computable functions, like the rule 110 cellular automaton. We need more constraints on what counts as the system actually computing, vs. being describable via some automaton.
This is a fascinating event. Iβm glad I could attend.
www.purdue.edu/events/ai-su...
If youβve not yet heard the good news (or youβre not convinced) about analog computation, hereβs a new publication for you!
doi.org/10.1002/wcs....
#philsci #cogsci