a man with a mustache is wearing a suit and tie and making a funny face . ALT: a man with a mustache is wearing a suit and tie and making a funny face .

a man with a mustache is wearing a suit and tie and making a funny face . ALT: a man with a mustache is wearing a suit and tie and making a funny face .

Claims about resilience & sustainability are not supported by UK public health, air quality, or climate policy evidence.
“Modern” stoves reduce some emissions relative to worse options, but do not make them low-impact.
Wood burning is a major source of harmful air pollution.
#StoveIndustryLies

Myth 1: The report treats all 'domestic burning' as one thing and therefore its headline numbers (eg. '2,500 deaths') are misleading / wrong. Fact: The 2,500 figure is a valid epidemiological attribution, not a list of named deaths. It is standard practice to combine emissions from all domestic combustion sources (open fires, legacy stoves, coal, solid fuels and some modern stoves) when modelling population-level health impacts. The figure is not wrong, and it does include emissions from modern stoves where they contribute to PM2.5 exposure. Sources: actionforcleanair.org.uk/files/health_impacts_from_domestic_burning_in_the_uk.pdf

Myth 1: The report treats all 'domestic burning' as one thing and therefore its headline numbers (eg. '2,500 deaths') are misleading / wrong. Fact: The 2,500 figure is a valid epidemiological attribution, not a list of named deaths. It is standard practice to combine emissions from all domestic combustion sources (open fires, legacy stoves, coal, solid fuels and some modern stoves) when modelling population-level health impacts. The figure is not wrong, and it does include emissions from modern stoves where they contribute to PM2.5 exposure. Sources: actionforcleanair.org.uk/files/health_impacts_from_domestic_burning_in_the_uk.pdf

Charnwoods article downplay risks, misinterprets key metrics and presents selective information in ways that obscure the real health and air-quality impacts of domestic burning.
They don't care about people's health. 
Just more #StoveIndustryLies

You really don't give a sh1t about peoples health do you?

A recent fact-check of one of your other articles full of misinformation.

A 2025 University of Surrey/CARE field study found that Ecodesign stoves produced higher UFP counts, especially when using briquette fuels.

And they say they care about clean air! They don't.

Usual rubbish from @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social They don't care about people's health. If they did they would actual look at the evidence, rather than promoting misinformation. By distorting evidence on stove pollution, the article misleads readers and harms efforts to protect public health.

Usual rubbish from @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social They don't care about people's health. If they did they would actual look at the evidence, rather than promoting misinformation. By distorting evidence on stove pollution, the article misleads readers and harms efforts to protect public health.

Usual rubbish from @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social
They don't care about people's health.
If they did they would actual look at the evidence, rather than promoting misinformation.
By distorting evidence on stove pollution, the article misleads readers and harms efforts to protect public health.

Usual rubbish from @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social They don't care about people's health. If they did they would actual look at the evidence, rather than promoting misinformation. By distorting evidence on stove pollution, the article misleads readers and harms efforts to protect public health.

Usual rubbish from @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social They don't care about people's health. If they did they would actual look at the evidence, rather than promoting misinformation. By distorting evidence on stove pollution, the article misleads readers and harms efforts to protect public health.

Usual rubbish from @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social
They don't care about people's health.
If they did they would actual look at the evidence, rather than promoting misinformation.
By distorting evidence on stove pollution, the article misleads readers and harms efforts to protect public health.

Charnwood Stoves fined £200,000 as worker loses foot in 2nd serious workplace accident in 4 years The UK wood‑stove maker has been hit with a £200,000 fine after a devastating factory accident led to a worker losing a foot in 2023

Here at the DSI we believe this case adds to a growing pattern of concerns surrounding Charnwood and the wider wood-burning sector. In our view, this raises questions about the strength of its internal safety culture.

deathstoveindustry.substack.com/p/charnwood-...

Charnwood Stoves fined £200,000 as worker loses foot in 2nd serious workplace accident in 4 years The UK wood‑stove maker has been hit with a £200,000 fine after a devastating factory accident led to a worker losing a foot in 2023

Here at the DSI we believe this case adds to a growing pattern of concerns surrounding Charnwood and the wider wood-burning sector. In our view, this raises questions about the strength of its internal safety culture.

deathstoveindustry.substack.com/p/charnwood-...

Every source Charnwood cites confirms domestic solid-fuel burning contributes to measurable PM2.5 health impacts. They selectively interpret the reports, emphasising uncertainty & test-bench stove performance while downplaying real-world emissions, exposure, & cumulative risk.
3/3

For a start, the headline is an answer to a strawman. Nobody has said modern stoves are causing 2,500 deaths. What they have said is that all wood burning, which modern stoves are a part of, have caused 2,500 "attributable deaths” 1/3

Domestic wood burners kill thousands and cost NHS millions a year, report suggests Burning of wood and coal in homes contributes to almost 2500 deaths a year, and stopping unnecessary burning would save the NHS millions of pounds, a report suggests. An analysis by the charity Globa...

Domestic wood burners kill thousands and cost NHS millions a year - BMJ

#AirPollution #WoodBurning #Health
www.bmj.com/content/391/...

While Ecodesign stoves can provide valuable heat during power cuts, they are not the most resilient or versatile solution for keeping a modern household running.
A home battery system offers much broader and cleaner energy resilience.
#StoveIndustryLies

While Ecodesign stoves can provide valuable heat during power cuts, they are not the most resilient or versatile solution for keeping a modern household running.
A home battery system offers much broader and cleaner energy resilience.
#StoveIndustryLies

Fact-Check Stove Industry Association Stoves vs Smoking? DSI DEATH STOVE INDUSTRY TLDR The SIA argues that comparisons between wood-burning stoves and cigarette smoke are misleading. However, independent research and government data show otherwise: Wood smoke ~ tobacco smoke: Both contain many of the same carcinogens and fine particles (PM2.5, PAHs, benzene, formaldehyde). Ecodesign # clean: Real-world stove emissions are several times higher than lab claims and can exceed WHO air-quality limits indoors. Indoor pollution persists: Even "sealed" or "Ready to Burn" stoves raise PM2.5 and VOC levels during normal use. Renewable # harmless: Domestic wood burning emits 17-21 % of UK PM2.5 but provides < 2 % of heat, an inefficient, high-pollution trade-off. Health & cost impacts: Studies find wood heating is often more expensive and less climate-efficient than heat pumps or gas.

Fact-Check Stove Industry Association Stoves vs Smoking? DSI DEATH STOVE INDUSTRY TLDR The SIA argues that comparisons between wood-burning stoves and cigarette smoke are misleading. However, independent research and government data show otherwise: Wood smoke ~ tobacco smoke: Both contain many of the same carcinogens and fine particles (PM2.5, PAHs, benzene, formaldehyde). Ecodesign # clean: Real-world stove emissions are several times higher than lab claims and can exceed WHO air-quality limits indoors. Indoor pollution persists: Even "sealed" or "Ready to Burn" stoves raise PM2.5 and VOC levels during normal use. Renewable # harmless: Domestic wood burning emits 17-21 % of UK PM2.5 but provides < 2 % of heat, an inefficient, high-pollution trade-off. Health & cost impacts: Studies find wood heating is often more expensive and less climate-efficient than heat pumps or gas.

Fact-Check Stove Industry Association Stoves vs Smoking? DSI DEATH STOVE INDUSTRY TLDR The SIA argues that comparisons between wood-burning stoves and cigarette smoke are misleading. However, independent research and government data show otherwise: Wood smoke ~ tobacco smoke: Both contain many of the same carcinogens and fine particles (PM2.5, PAHs, benzene, formaldehyde). Ecodesign # clean: Real-world stove emissions are several times higher than lab claims and can exceed WHO air-quality limits indoors. Indoor pollution persists: Even "sealed" or "Ready to Burn" stoves raise PM2.5 and VOC levels during normal use. Renewable # harmless: Domestic wood burning emits 17-21 % of UK PM2.5 but provides < 2 % of heat, an inefficient, high-pollution trade-off. Health & cost impacts: Studies find wood heating is often more expensive and less climate-efficient than heat pumps or gas.

The Stove Industry Association wrote an article saying it was misleading to compare wood burning stoves to cigarette smoke.

I fact-checked their article.

Wood smoke and tobacco smoke both contain many of the same carcinogens and fine particles (PM2.5, PAHs, benzene, formaldehyde).

A fact-check of the SIA article that @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social are referring to. It's just more misinformation.

The SIA article selectively omits key evidence on, the shared toxicology between wood and tobacco smoke and real-world emission levels from Ecodesign stoves.
#StoveIndustryLies

Fact-Check - SIA - Stoves vs Smoking.pdf

PDF with links to sources: drive.google.com/file/d/1AtEI...

A fact-check of the SIA article that @charnwoodstoves.bsky.social are referring to. It's just more misinformation.

The SIA article selectively omits key evidence on, the shared toxicology between wood and tobacco smoke and real-world emission levels from Ecodesign stoves.
#StoveIndustryLies

Thanks for proving my point.

Instead of trying to sensibly debate the information I've posted, you've resorted to insults.

Maybe you have no more insight to share??!

"Abuse is just the last desperate resorts of those with no insight left to share." - J.Scarlett

a woman wearing a shirt that says sports car on it is laughing Alt: a woman wearing a shirt that says sports car on it is laughing

Or it's because we need to protect ourselves from nasty people like you.

Honestly you do spout lots of rubbish. It's easy to find the misinformation.

You keep saying you are an expert but you are definitely not an expert in air pollution or the health effects of air pollution.

Construction, freight, and wood burning: how we can reduce air pollution at source | British Safety Council While you’re reading this, it’s likely you’re breathing polluted air. That’s because in 40 cities across the UK, people are inhaling a dangerous cocktail of chemicals, levels of which are equal to, an...

Construction, freight and wood burning: how we can reduce air pollution at source - British Safety Council

#AirPollution #Health #Environment
www.britsafe.org/safety-manag...

Smoke and Invisible Pollution Myth 1: If you can’t see smoke, there’s no pollution.
Fact: Wood smoke contains invisible PM2.5, ultrafine particles, and gases like benzene and PAHs. These pollutants persist even when no plume is visible and they’re the most harmful to health. Myth 2: Only the visible plume matters for health.
Fact: The smallest particles are invisible and they’re the most dangerous. PM2.5 and ultrafine particles reach deep into the lungs and bloodstream, linked to heart, lung and brain disease. Myth 3: If neighbours can’t see or smell smoke, it’s harmless.
Fact: Invisible wood smoke still travels. Monitoring shows local air spikes when stoves are lit, even without visible plumes. Health risks don’t depend on what you can see or smell. Myth 4: Ecodesign stoves eliminate smoke.
Fact: Even “clean” burns release invisible fine particles and toxic gases. You may not see or smell smoke, but harmful pollution is still entering your home and neighbourhood air.
Ecodesign stoves reduce visible emissions but still emit far more PM2.5 per unit of heat than gas. They replace visible smoke with invisible pollution that still harms health. ✅ Bottom line:
Smoke is not just what you see. The most harmful pollution from wood burning is invisible, odourless, and still present even in “clean” stoves. Invisible doesn’t mean harmless.

Beautiful sentiment...NOT! Burning wood indoors adds fine-particle pollution that harms lungs and heart. Smoke isn’t therapy.

The most harmful pollution from wood burning is invisible, odourless, and still present even in “clean” stoves.
#StoveIndustryLies

Smoke and Invisible Pollution Myth 1: If you can’t see smoke, there’s no pollution.
Fact: Wood smoke contains invisible PM2.5, ultrafine particles, and gases like benzene and PAHs. These pollutants persist even when no plume is visible and they’re the most harmful to health. Myth 2: Only the visible plume matters for health.
Fact: The smallest particles are invisible and they’re the most dangerous. PM2.5 and ultrafine particles reach deep into the lungs and bloodstream, linked to heart, lung and brain disease. Myth 3: If neighbours can’t see or smell smoke, it’s harmless.
Fact: Invisible wood smoke still travels. Monitoring shows local air spikes when stoves are lit, even without visible plumes. Health risks don’t depend on what you can see or smell. Myth 4: Ecodesign stoves eliminate smoke.
Fact: Even “clean” burns release invisible fine particles and toxic gases. You may not see or smell smoke, but harmful pollution is still entering your home and neighbourhood air.
Ecodesign stoves reduce visible emissions but still emit far more PM2.5 per unit of heat than gas. They replace visible smoke with invisible pollution that still harms health. ✅ Bottom line:
Smoke is not just what you see. The most harmful pollution from wood burning is invisible, odourless, and still present even in “clean” stoves. Invisible doesn’t mean harmless.

Beautiful sentiment...NOT! Burning wood indoors adds fine-particle pollution that harms lungs and heart. Smoke isn’t therapy.

The most harmful pollution from wood burning is invisible, odourless, and still present even in “clean” stoves.
#StoveIndustryLies

Wood smoke pollution harms pets too When fine particle pollution levels go up, so do veterinary costs. Lowering air pollution levels would improve our pets’ health as well as our own.

☹️
www.dsawsp.org/blog/wood-sm...

Fact-Check - Smoke and Invisible Pollution.pdf

PDF with links to all sources: drive.google.com/file/d/146ZV...

Smoke and Invisible Pollution Myth 1: If you can’t see smoke, there’s no pollution.
Fact: Wood smoke contains invisible PM2.5, ultrafine particles, and gases like benzene and PAHs. These pollutants persist even when no plume is visible and they’re the most harmful to health. Myth 2: Only the visible plume matters for health.
Fact: The smallest particles are invisible and they’re the most dangerous. PM2.5 and ultrafine particles reach deep into the lungs and bloodstream, linked to heart, lung and brain disease. Myth 3: If neighbours can’t see or smell smoke, it’s harmless.
Fact: Invisible wood smoke still travels. Monitoring shows local air spikes when stoves are lit, even without visible plumes. Health risks don’t depend on what you can see or smell. Myth 4: Ecodesign stoves eliminate smoke.
Fact: Even “clean” burns release invisible fine particles and toxic gases. You may not see or smell smoke, but harmful pollution is still entering your home and neighbourhood air.
Ecodesign stoves reduce visible emissions but still emit far more PM2.5 per unit of heat than gas. They replace visible smoke with invisible pollution that still harms health. ✅ Bottom line:
Smoke is not just what you see. The most harmful pollution from wood burning is invisible, odourless, and still present even in “clean” stoves. Invisible doesn’t mean harmless.

Invisible wood smoke from any stove, including “clean” Ecodesign models, contains harmful PM2.5 and toxic gases.
You can’t see or smell the worst pollution, but it still travels and damages lungs, heart, and brain. Invisible does not equal harmless.
#StoveIndustryLies

Fact-Check - Island Pellet Stoves - Nation Cymru.pdf

PDF with links to sources: drive.google.com/file/d/1k4vP...

Original Article: nation.cymru/news/welsh-invention-prevents-indoor-pollution-from-wood-burning-stoves/

Welsh invention prevents indoor pollution from wood burning stoves? The article overstates what the new “pollution-preventing” pellet stove can do. While it’s a useful advance, the claims of eliminating indoor pollution or solving the wood-burning problem are misleading. No stove is emission-free. Even sealed or DEFRA-approved pellet stoves release pollutants during ignition, refuelling, or from leaks. Lab tests ≠ real homes. The “20× cleaner” figure for pellet stoves reflects ideal lab conditions, not real-world variability or other pollutants like CO, VOCs and ultrafine particles. Indoor exposure is mostly reduced only for the stove user. While this technology may improve air quality inside the home where the stove is used, neighbouring homes and outdoor air are still heavily impacted. Studies show homes with stoves have higher indoor PM2.5, and pollutant spikes occur when doors are opened. Public health impact persists. Even “clean” stoves contribute to outdoor PM2.5 and shared air pollution. It’s a major health concern. Bottom line:
This technology can reduce emissions and exposure but does not eliminate them or resolve the wider air-quality problem from domestic wood burning. The article’s “pollution-free” framing exaggerates its real impact.

Myth 4: This invention solves the air-quality/health problem of wood burning.
Fact: It addresses only one piece (indoor emission exposure). The broader public health burden is significantly driven by ambient / outdoor particulate pollution resulting from wood combustion in many homes. Indoor exposure is mostly reduced only for the stove user. While this technology may improve air quality inside the home where the stove is used, neighbouring homes and outdoor air are still heavily impacted. Estimates of annual health costs tied to domestic wood burning in London are around £173 million due to PM2.5 and NO₂ impacts.
Even “cleaner” stoves contribute to that shared burden. ✅ Bottom Line
This technology can reduce emissions and exposure but does not eliminate them or resolve the wider air-quality problem from domestic wood burning. The article’s “pollution-free” framing exaggerates its real impact. 
Indoor exposure reductions are real but not perfect. Spikes and leaks still occur in real homes.
The larger issue of ambient air pollution and collective health burden remains unaddressed by any single “clean” stove.

A recent article from Nation Cymru overstates the capabilities of a pellet stove technology by using absolutes like “eliminate” or “prevent.”
The larger issue of ambient air pollution and collective health burden remains unaddressed by any single “clean” stove.
#StoveIndustryLies

Myth 4: This invention solves the air-quality/health problem of wood burning.
Fact: It addresses only one piece (indoor emission exposure). The broader public health burden is significantly driven by ambient / outdoor particulate pollution resulting from wood combustion in many homes. Indoor exposure is mostly reduced only for the stove user. While this technology may improve air quality inside the home where the stove is used, neighbouring homes and outdoor air are still heavily impacted. Estimates of annual health costs tied to domestic wood burning in London are around £173 million due to PM2.5 and NO₂ impacts.
Even “cleaner” stoves contribute to that shared burden. ✅ Bottom Line
This technology can reduce emissions and exposure but does not eliminate them or resolve the wider air-quality problem from domestic wood burning. The article’s “pollution-free” framing exaggerates its real impact. 
Indoor exposure reductions are real but not perfect. Spikes and leaks still occur in real homes.
The larger issue of ambient air pollution and collective health burden remains unaddressed by any single “clean” stove.

PDF with links to sources: drive.google.com/file/d/1k4vP...

Original Article: nation.cymru/news/welsh-invention-prevents-indoor-pollution-from-wood-burning-stoves/