Hazel Weakly's Avatar

Hazel Weakly

@hazelweakly.me

I have thoughts. Lots of thoughts. They never stop thinking. Never stop thunking. hachyderm.io/@hazelweakly

8,895
Followers
948
Following
5,259
Posts
05.05.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Hazel Weakly @hazelweakly.me

No this is so real tho

06.03.2026 08:06 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Inspirational 🫑

06.03.2026 07:48 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I need to start adopting these habits for myself :)

This is a great reminder!

05.03.2026 21:10 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

These are all the habits I use fwiw.

+ I try to ensure I am reading at minimum 10-20% work led by grad students/early career/fresh voices; you avoid the calcification and sanded-off edges and get much fresher, bolder ideas that way

05.03.2026 20:04 πŸ‘ 35 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I got comms training a couple years ago, which developer advocates do not commonly have. This drama is a REAL good argument for making that mandatory for your teams lmao

05.03.2026 13:04 πŸ‘ 64 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 0

quite the opposite really. Orgs should be seeing AI as a highly heterogenous set of individual experiments; even if you HAD good "productivity" measurements before I wouldn't trust them without a thorough re-examination of their operationalization now

04.03.2026 16:48 πŸ‘ 44 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 0

In a very rare happenstance, some cancellations happened and I'm now going to be speaking at Platform Day at KubeCon EU! My talk will be on building extensible platforms.

Given that I'm *also* speaking at QCon London, my March is about to be a lot busier. I'm excited!

09.02.2026 18:05 πŸ‘ 29 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

No one could’ve predicted that the plausible text generator machine would generate plausible text

04.03.2026 07:23 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

[lowtax speedrun: the country]

04.03.2026 06:02 πŸ‘ 33 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

If any time was a good time to argue that energy security comes from renewables, now would be that time... 25% of production blockaded is a hell of a price shock.

03.03.2026 17:46 πŸ‘ 49 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes! Absolutely! It’s so fascinating how impactful these subtle language and messaging changes are (and how culturally dependent or context dependent they are too)

[I originally wrote this by saying β€œminor” instead of β€œsubtle” and realised that wasn’t what I wanted to say… proving the point πŸ˜…]

03.03.2026 08:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

(They did not, for some reason, conclude that maybe we should pick a different word for β€œconcept with known solution if one has a magic library card”…)

03.03.2026 06:54 πŸ‘ 9 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

The other professor stops the first and exclaims β€œthere’s no way that’s trivial!”

The first goes β€œyeah it is, see here … wait” and then immediately confuses themselves

After about twenty minutes of furious problem solving on a blackboard, they both concluded that it was indeed trivial after all

03.03.2026 06:54 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

It reminds me of a physics joke that we tell when introducing β€œtrivial” in classes:

Two physics professors are working on a problem and one is explaining the solution in their paper to the other line by line. The first professor gets to one line and says β€œand the simplification here is trivial” …

03.03.2026 06:54 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I try to use β€œstraightforward” instead of trivial, and I’ll often throw in β€œβ€¦but not necessarily easy, obvious, or intuitive”

But yeah. Being in math brain for so long makes it really easy for me to forget how off putting certain phrases are!

03.03.2026 06:54 πŸ‘ 26 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s so wrong. I used it once just to see if I could and it was repulsive

03.03.2026 06:13 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh I definitely mean the stupidest possible option of course

02.03.2026 21:26 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

*me, sobbing hysterically* you can’t just call everything email!

*them, pressing M-x butterfly to send emoji encoded blockchain updates about your cars extended warranty over carrier pigeon*: this too, is email

02.03.2026 21:25 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0
Reactions in Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Support

Context, for those unaware of these cursed software features:

support.microsoft.com/en-us/office...

support.google.com/mail/answer/...

02.03.2026 21:25 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

Poll: should β€œreaction emojis” (which are called reactji, apparently??) be considered a valid form of email, and should your email client let you send react-o-mail?

Like = fuck no

Repost = absolutely fuck not

02.03.2026 21:22 πŸ‘ 22 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1

As you should

02.03.2026 07:09 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Ty ty πŸ₯Ί

01.03.2026 14:25 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Attention: I have hit inbox zero on every work and personal email

Please clap, it took me hours 😭

28.02.2026 21:53 πŸ‘ 48 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1

Your For You feed has trans shitposting on it eh? Let me know when I need to send you some Programmer Socksβ„’

28.02.2026 20:11 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Good thing I’m building that :)

Internally, unfortunately, but it’s gonna be awesome

27.02.2026 18:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Exactly!

The only thing that’s major and left on my list is I want a way to
1. Embed compliance controls into the metadata so I can mix different levels of sensitive data into the same β€œbucket”
2. Ability to seamlessly control data sovereignty on a per field basis

(& even for semi structured data)

27.02.2026 15:24 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I continue to be fascinated by the phenomenon whereby an expert engages with any of the LLMs on their field of expertise and is instantly horrified by the wrong answers, and then goes on to use it for things they are not experts in as though it won’t be just as bad for those.

27.02.2026 14:15 πŸ‘ 3159 πŸ” 934 πŸ’¬ 54 πŸ“Œ 91

I thought this was a positive sentiment until I zoomed in a bit

And then I understood *completely*

27.02.2026 15:15 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Right?? I’m stoked about this

27.02.2026 15:14 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Happy birthday :)

27.02.2026 15:05 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0