@benfarrand
Prof in Law & Emerging Technologies. Interactions between law, geopolitics and technology governance. Currently writing about EU Digital Sovereignty. Probably just here to post synthwave and talk about microchips.
Digital sovereignty is a strategically flexible concept, and if you are interested in its development and evolution, check our new article in @govjournal.bsky.social: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
1/8
Happy to give virtual or in-person talks for anyone who may be interested!
"Geopolitical Union: Europe's Attempt to Take Back Control of Technology Regulation" by Benjamin Farrand
Examines the European Commission’s concerns around the economic power of the US and China, its own security vulnerabilities, and how dependent it is upon technologies produced outside of its territory.
'Geopolitical Union' by Benjamin Farrand, Coming Soon
#LawSky #EU
https://cup.org/49d4mO9
CJEI: no, no, don’t you see, surveillance IS privacy!
The Court has just provided the ammunition the Commission is looking for to justify scaling back on the areas identified as structurally blocking growth in technology…
In the same ways that The Beatles were a death metal band, maybe.
WHEN IN TIME DO WE NEED "ABANDONED MALL MUSIC" IF NOT NOW, WHEN DO WE NEED TO HEAR DA RUINS OF AMERICAN CULTURE FLOAT IN A CLOUD OF REVERB IF NOT NOW, WHEN SHOULD SLOWED DOWN MUSIC BE A BALM FOR DA EAR'S OF DA WORKING PERSON IF NOT NOW, AND DA TEXT : "I MISS VAPOR WAVE ,ALL MUSIC SHOULD BE OTHER MUSIC THATS SLOWED DOWN, ALL MUSIC SHOULD BE ABLOUT DOLPHINS AND STATUE'S, ALL MUSIC SHOULD SOUND LIKE SHIT " - DASHARE.ZONE ADMIN
BRING IT BACK - dashare.zone ADMIN
🧵🚨
The UK’s independent scientific bodies are highly vulnerable to politicisation - over the past 5 months I've been working with @martinmckee.bsky.social to map out their vulnerabilities and it's not good news.
Today our report is published!
www.ucl.ac.uk/policy-lab/n...
1/11
But if people know what we’re interested in, then we might have to actually do those things! 😬
Thrilled to share my new short-form piece with the BISA ISET WG 🚀
My piece explores how AI governance needs to move past rigid, one-size-fits-all frameworks and embrace more adaptive, context-sensitive pathways.
Grateful to @mybisa.bsky.social and @benfarrand.bsky.social for this opportunity
Close-up of a glowing AI microchip embedded on a circuit board.
Out now! A fantastic new BISA International Studies and Emerging Technologies Working Group short-form article 🎉
'Beyond frameworks: Alternative pathways for AI governance in a fragmented world' by Alp Cenk Arslan, PhD 📚
Read here 👉 https://ow.ly/uzcN50X5sVi
Ben Farrand
Last chance to sign up! ⏰
Sign up to join the new International Studies and Emerging Technologies WG convenors as they introduce themselves, give a short presentation and set the agenda for this year! 🎉
Register here 👉 buff.ly/4nl02IH
@benfarrand.bsky.social
True, a lot of it also depends on how ‘lawful access’ is defined. Some arguing it means ‘without breaching TPMs to access’. That would be my reading based on measure 1.2 of the copyright chapter of the general purpose AI Code of Practice
Is the issue that they think there could possibly be value chain liability, maybe?
Commission published a Code of Practice which is more detailed here: ec.europa.eu/newsroom/dae.... Seems to suggest they view it as falling within the TDM exception unless rights are specifically reserved.
From my reading of Article 53(1)(c), it’s for GEN AI providers that place the product on the market. AI providers are defined under Article 3 as those putting the product on the market, so arguably it wouldn’t apply to independent researchers. Just my reading though!
The UN Cybercrime Convention under Article 14 maybe? I think the US is likely to adopt it unless something changes (which wouldn’t surprise me).
Make sure you sign up to join the new International Studies and Emerging Technologies WG convenors as they introduce themselves, give a short presentation and set the agenda for this year! 🎉
Register here 👉 buff.ly/qBpUNff
@benfarrand.bsky.social
Clean Industrial Deal… or Dirty Industrial Deal? The so-called #CID may sound green — but it’s not clean and definitely not climate-friendly. Born out of heavy polluter lobbying, it weakens rules and funnels public money to big industry, while ignoring real climate solutions.
@benfarrand.bsky.social & Dr Mike Bourne are the new International Studies and Emerging Technologies WG conveners! 🌟
They are calling for expressions of interest! Presenting work, writing small articles and discussing your work-in-progress 🎉
Find out more here 👉
Slightly diminish a band:
Jane’s Craving
‘But how can we profit unless we turn games into services you have to pay monthly for?
‘I’m not owned, I’m not owned’ I continue to insist as I slowly shrink tariffs on corncobs.
You’re charging me $5 dollars for drinking the coffee I bought? No, you’re paying ME $5 dollars so I can drink that coffee. Also I’m charging you for that mug.
Oh absolutely, it’s just the EU wasn’t particularly vocal about it until maybe the past 10-12 years. Also, EU’s commitment to its own values is occasionally pretty shaky.
Yeah, you can see this in various ways during the 2nd Obama Administration, before a clearer divergence in values starts getting more explicit in 2016.
I think a bit like Fukuyama, Angell’s argument was somewhat misunderstood/misrepresented by critics immediately after WWI. Angell never said it couldn’t happen, only that it would be economically ruinous.
