It ist gut advice, ja.
It ist gut advice, ja.
Now that you mention it, it seems very obvious. Oops.
Today my website got a teeny-tiny bit better. Once again, all I did was wait and then update something.
tfedder.de/blog/wastefu...
"radicalized"? How is that an extreme take?
I leave many such pages without knowing what they meant to convey.
Last month, when I read your post, I was confused at first, because everything seemed fine. Then I realised that I was still blocking your site's JS.
So many other (almost blank) pages on other sites are certainly more explicit about my wrong preferences.
Client-side validation at its best!
into a logic byβpassing binary context window, amirite?
Overall great advice, but I would prefer a text file over an OpenDocument odt.
And please never ever send a Microslop Word docx without asking for consent first.
Sounds like a refurbished ThinkPad, given the budget, with Linux Mint.
Unless Word/Excel is meant literally, for heavy use of Microslops proprietary formats, good luck then.
I can confirm. Still not making it.
Do you really NEED iOS users having a great experience on your site?
Most of them made a choice to use that ecosystem, right?
It is, effectively, what they wanted.
βDisabled people can just contact us and weβll tell them what accommodations are available!β
Donβt do this. Because EVERYONE does this. Itβs utterly exhausting.
Put all your accessibility info online. Keep it updated.
Stop making disabled people use extra time and energy to participate.
βοΈ New article: Webspace Invaders
πΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎπΎ
matthiasott.com/articles/web...
You are not powerless. You are not alone. Groups aggregate power. Be together.
Scott Riley tested free and open source design tools out when researching his course, Mindful Design. They actually worked out better than Figma ever could, as he explains in this article with loads of options for you.
piccalil.li/blog/the-ope...
Yes andβββwherever it came fromβββIβdβΒ like to change the viewbox in CSS too.
A declarative way to repeat nodes in shadow dom surrounding each slotted light dom node.
3 and 3 in one browser
2 and 7 in the other browser
Fine with me.
Just on my machines (Windows and Linux), or is there something weird going on with tabbing backwards through modeless dialogs in Firefox in general? Backwards the focus is trapped as if it were modal.
codepen.io/tfedder-de/pen/XJKEMLv
Could it be that your website is too interesting? Like, it's a you problem. No issues with traffic surges on my site whatsoever.
I forgot that dialog .show() is just position:absolute and without top layer. Okay, so <dialog popover> is the way to go for modeless dialogs which definitely should exist.
Definitely not less confused now. π΅βπ«
So dialog showModal for modal dialogs; of course, for the inertness. Agreed. Easy.
But non-modal dialogs shouldn't exist, except maybe, but then use <dialog popover> because popover is better supported than Invoker Commands and closedby=any.
Yes? Anything else?
As someone who canβt figure out when to use popover vs non-modal dialog, I am asking:
Why shouldnβt non-modal dialogs exist?
Yes! You are absolutely right. Butβ¦
as someone who uses a secondary 1080Γ1920 monitor, I can tell you: people struggle with horizontal media queries as it is. If they actually applied vertical ones, it would only get worse.
Exactly. Everybody can have money. Who cares? Capital on the other hand should be owned by all workers and only workers.
#Merit
Which is based on surveillance capitalism btw
Considering the share of users it is a duopoly already. And that is due to a moat, not because of competitiveness. Once that walled garden collapses, the Chromium monopoly will be just one antitrust ruling away from being seperated from the only entity that can profitably maintain it.
Exactly. There is nothing to recommend. I am sticking with Firefox for now.
But what I am saying is: I am afraid the web is doomed.