We, or rather our creations—LLMs—should strive to be good, mature poets, rather than condemning ourselves as bad poets from the outset.
T. S. Eliot “Philip Massinger” (The Sacred Wood, 1920)
“Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal; bad poets deface what they take, and good poets make it into something better, or at least something different.”
カスのライフハックですが、通販につきもののダンボールを捨てずに貯めておくことで反響が減ってスピーカーで音楽を聴くときに音質が良くなったと錯覚出来ます。
その代償として部屋は汚くなるし狭くなります。
But I wonder how many users truly realize that this was once pioneered by the same Jack Patrick Dorsey as 𝕏, and that, just like 𝕏, it was abandoned by him—and that his stance is that all intellectual property rights should be deleted.
I completely understand the growing distrust in 𝕏 and how the social media platforms one wants to use change over time.
It's the same vibe as YouTube's auto-captions or translated audio. The real issue is how users see it; we just need better media literacy, for real. Isn't it kind of capped that users who were totally fine using manga panels, show clips, and Tenor GIFs are now suddenly up in arms about it?
Okay, real talk: I don't think the AI's stance on that app has really shifted just because they added a "quick grok" button. At the end of the day, whether that button's there or not, people can still screenshot stuff—and there's literally no way to stop them from dumping those pics into AI tools.
SNSくん、日本という国は欧米諸国と違って連絡先に登録してる現実の知人と必ずしもオンラインでも繋がりたい訳じゃないんだ。
アプリ起動直後にその手のポップアップを出すのはやめるんだ。
やめるんだ。
𝕏が落ちた途端
現れる皆さん
How should one vent the kind of destructive urge that makes them want to lash out physically at something?
I can't help but regret not being born in a country like America, where you can shoot guns at a firing range.
I suppose I shouldn't wish for anything, should I?
I am suffering from depression and had no choice but to drop out of my studies. Even though I'm supposedly convalescing, all I do is take medication, and I'm not getting any better at all. I can't even get a job.
From 2 Thessalonians, Chapter 3, Verse 10: "εἴ τις οὐ θέλει ἐργάζεσθαι μηδὲ ἐσθιέτω"
もう良いやどうでも
母が心配しているのは「息子が無職である」ことではなく、「自分の息子が無職である」ことなのかもしれない。
plz……plz give me Sora's invite code……
Sociology appears to be a curious discipline. I hope that someday I might engage in meaningful intellectual exchange with knowledgeable experts in the field.
To me, this appears not as "hypothesis" or "research," but rather as literary rhetoric—specifically, "how to craft one's unsupported claims to appear legitimate."
"prepare a proposition whose truth value has been arbitrarily predetermined" and then "later devise a research perspective that allows for interpreting data collected in a manner that does not contradict the truth of that proposition."
However, the research method presented by the Japanese sociologist I mentioned earlier can be interpreted as recommending that one:
and that "research" means "verifying the truth or falsity of that proposition—regardless of whether the result differs from one's initial expectations."
As someone involved in formal science, I understand that "formulating a hypothesis" means "translating one's own questions into propositions that can be distinguished as true or false,"
This approach seems to conflate 'hypotheses' with 'propositions that can be evaluated as true or false'—particularly propositions whose truth value has been predetermined.
What interpretations regarding this methodological approach are considered mainstream within the field?
1. predetermining desired conclusions,
2. reverse-engineering hypotheses to support those conclusions,
3. iteratively modifying hypotheses until all contradictory evidence is eliminated.
As someone working in the formal sciences, I lack expertise in sociology. However, I observe that the research methodology demonstrated in this post appears to involve:
真っ当に生きることがただ難しい
わたしに何か質問がある方はこちらへどうぞ
3営業日以内に猟犬を伴って回答にお伺いいたします
Smartphones and computers are currently evolving and will likely also become these 'unconsciously ordinary things' in the future. This isn't a loss of dignity or value; it's simply that the better something becomes, the more likely it is to escape notice.