department of "limited overseas military operation"
@gelliottmorris.com
i write the data-driven politics newsletter Strength In Numbers: gelliottmorris.com/subscribe wrote a book by the same name wwnorton.com/books/Strength-in-Numbers polling averages at @fiftyplusone.news formerly @ 538 & The Economist. email, don't DM, me
department of "limited overseas military operation"
First poll I've seen on support for impeaching Trump over his handling of the Epstein files www.dataforprogress.org/blog/2026/2/...
noem? more like noe more
Taking questions for the interactive segment of our live podcast taping happening at 2PM Eastern! We love audience questions. Put them in this thread: open.substack.com/chat/posts/b...
Not my model, L2's, and yes I think so
bingo
let me put it this way: once you control for race, the income coefficient is close to zero, and in fact may be negative for mamdani (super-rich whites are the most pro-cuomo group in the electorate)
Since everyone is talking about new voters, I pulled up the Virginia voter file to check how many 2025 general election voters were non-2024 voters. Per L2, that number is 200k, or about 6% of all ballots cast in the race. These 200k were modeled at 60% Dem and 20% Rep
pretty sure this income relationship is confounded with race
technically there is no "evidence" that you are conscious either
tell us why!
is daines worried about being the last statewide elected official who hasnβt committed a public assault on someone?
"All the MAGAs I follow are ___"
Ok, and that wouldn't matter if journalists stopped writing content on the site β and in doing so, exposing themselves to all the posts from the fringe right of U.S. politics that have been algorithmically tuned to pickle their brains. It's a giant red filter bubble
I don't have a problem with Tim. But I do think it is deleterious that so many smart people spend so much time on X, which has essentially become an algorithmically and AI-optimized far-right MAGA message testing and propaganda machine. People assume X posts represent the masses, but they don't!
So one Republican senator from Montana tonight suddenly announced he would not run for re-election this year, and the other Republican senator from Montana broke a guy's hand?
Talarico is running an anti-system campaign that could be very appealing to indiesΒ & Trump voters (who you need to win in a Trump +14 state). By highlighting positions that are not correlated with left-right ideology, he can attract right-leaning voters. Smart www.gelliottmorris.com/p/meet-ameri...
59% of Americans Oppose the Military Action in Iran www.nytimes.com/2026/03/04/u...
the conventional wisdom a year ago was that trump was untouchable on immigration and indomitable with independents and democrats shouldn't even talk about the issue
One of the JD Vance lines that worked best with young men in 2024 was that America shouldn't be funding foreign wars when people at home are suffering. I imagine this price tag isn't going to sit well with them
We are getting a lot of polls on the US war in Iran now that pollsters have had time to be in the field. There is a general consensus across surveys, but some notable disagreement to unpack. We will do that tomorrow in the live Strength In Numbers podcast:
open.substack.com/live-stream/...
New @nbcnews.com poll
On what Americans think about Trumpβs handling of Iran:
β’ 41% approve
β’ 54% disapprove
β’ 3% no opinion
β’ 2% not sure
Should the U.S. have taken military action against Iran?
β’ 41% say yes
β’ 52% say no
β’ 7% not sure
www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...
Texas reaction post
www.gelliottmorris.com/p/six-data-d...
Quite literally βwe have always been at war with Iran.β
well put
i do not think we have enough publicly accessible data to answer this question. maybe a private campaign was doing some sort of active listening project and can say, but certainly for the public data folks the answer has to be "idk"
Eastern
That was for ABC polling. David is talking about YouGov, which is honestly a better comparison since in 2018 ABC was using noisy RDD polls and YouGovβs methodology is more apples to apples
Subscribe to Strength In Numbers and join 60,000 people who get a data-driven analysis of the news sent straight to their inboxes* **
*or optionally no email, just the app
**and have an equally positive reaction to this one toward everything I write, Iβm sure
www.gelliottmorris.com/subscribe