That sounds likeβ¦POSITIVE sentiment!
Still got it.
@altmetric.com
We measure the attention that research outputs receive from policy documents, mainstream news outlets, Wikipedia, social media and online reference managers. We detect sentiment of Bluesky/X posts. Come for the attention to research. Stay for the memes.
*late last year
FYI We detect sentiment for posts on Bluesky and Twitter since posted last year
A man in a grey coat reads from a script. To the left Eric Topolβs profile and book front covers.
@erictopol.bsky.social good to see you on Good Work!
youtu.be/W0ltbBby9FU?...
"Like all ALPSP trainings, I always very much appreciate the breakout groups/discussions. It's always nice to hear from so many different departments and positions to gain greater insights and perspectives in what other organizations are doing. The other great thing were the DEMOS! I never knew I could do some of those things in both excel and Altmetrics. I could see myself really being more data driven in my work." - Ashlina Chin, National Academy of Sciences
π£οΈ "The other great thing were the DEMOS! I never knew I could do some of those things in both excel and Altmetrics." - Ashlina Chin, National Academy of Sciences
Join us for 'Journal Metric Analysis and Measuring Impact' this June π buff.ly/jVYA9vy
Virtual Training | Project Management for Publishing Conference | UP Redux 2026 Virtual Training | How Journals Work Virtual Training | Introduction to People Management in Publishing Webinar | Digital-First Production: From JATS XML to Accessible Publishing
What's coming up this March at ALPSP?
Find out more by visiting our 'What's On' page on the ALPSP website!
π buff.ly/fC1bPTq
We are inspired...stay tuned!
Vraiment genial!
*Goof
*Goof
*Good
FYI - March 8th is National Proofreding Day
Ha, good catch - thereβs plenty of flatfooted ways to describe βthings with scholarly identifiersβ. They do indeed cover datasets, images, or in this case, articles on nature News. We need a better term!
Oh yes, what I meant by that was that the Twitterati love to claim Bluesky and other places are infested with the woke mind virus. But as the articleβs sharing demonstrates, thereβs robust discussion over there too!
Congrats! The Germans call that "GlΓΌck im UnglΓΌck". "Lucky side-effect of being unlucky."
So yeah, the trend is still, there, but twitter appears to be on the up, volume-wise. That doesn't speak to the quality of the communication on there.
Bluesky share is about 67% off Twitter's. Still massive for its young years and size.
We'll keep watch as the year progresses.
9/9
Exhibit 3: Gladys Mae West, one of the Hidden Figures, and a giant of science, died in January. Her obituary, published in Nature, reached 22m users on Bluesky, and 4.4m on X.
NOT. EVEN. CLOSE.
Rip Gladys, what a queen.
www.altmetric.com/details/1878...
8/9
Exhibit 2: Flexible use of a multi-purpose tool by a cow, which went heavily viral here but was relatively muted on Twitter.
www.altmetric.com/details/1875...
7/9
2026 research that exploded on Bluesky and dwarfed its Twitter audience: exhibit 1; The Political Effect of X's algorithm.
Shared by more accounts on Bluesky, but to a WIDER audience on X, due to follower counts of these users being higher there than here.
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
6/9
Trend line for tweets versus Bluesky posts for this article: linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673626004149
Same day on Twitter: GET THIS. "RFK Jnr: 1 Year of Failure" trended way higher on Twitter than Bluesky. 2,000 tweets sharing this article. Who's the woke echo-chamber NOW, Twitter?
Sentiment is 20% strong negative (very high compared to the average), positive sentiment, 67%. Largely a win.
5/9
On Feb 27 nearly 3,800 tweets are dedicated to sharing this article on Pokemon at 30:
www.altmetric.com/details/1914...
4/9
What research goes viral on which platform is also interesting. For example, that highest point on Twitter's data is from Feb 27.
Here's what was going viral that day on Twitter:
3/9
increasing trend of Twitter sharing of research
Interestingly Twitter's trend this year is UPWARD, at least so far. Here are the volumes of posts that link to research published After Jan 1st 2026 over there.
2/9
Twitter mentions Friday 6 February: 17,947 posts Bluesky, same timeframe: 24,512 posts
Since we have 2 months of 2026 data now, we can see if the trend we saw last year holds up: does research from the current year get shared more on Bluesky or X-Twitter?
As you can see here, we still see days regularly where Bluesky's volume of research sharing is markedly higher than Twitter.
1/9
Twitter and 4chan being barely distinguishable is an ironically accurate design choice.
Meme origin by platform. Twitter dropping since 2020. TikTok escalating massively
It's not only academic twitter that is in decline.
Co-Signed
I should have gone with THAT
How we arrived on Bluesky
Digital Science partners with Higher Education Research Security Association
www.researchinformation.info/news/digital...
Collaboration aimed at strengthening research security and integrity across UK universities
@digital-science.com
New readership, citation, and Altmetric highlights from Feminist Media Studies π Our work continues to travel widely across scholarship, policy spaces, digital publics, and news media! Here are a few recent snapshots:
My article about the implications of the war for Area Studies made it into the top ten list of highest Altmetric Attention Score across all T&F journals over the last week. The article has been made free to access until 31st March. [link in next post]