Lost, in tech's Avatar

Lost, in tech

@lostintech.co.uk

Yes, that asshole with the youtube

766
Followers
225
Following
3,083
Posts
12.06.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Lost, in tech @lostintech.co.uk

theyre also way more satisfying to drive in, I gotta say

07.03.2026 21:16 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Well, it turns out you CAN use screws in 3D Prints! But...
Well, it turns out you CAN use screws in 3D Prints! But... YouTube video by Lost In Tech

youtu.be/8F4G-OyXHJs

A video about screws.

07.03.2026 20:38 ๐Ÿ‘ 9 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

The pair of you have never responded to any of my comments so I'll take AI responses as an upgrade ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜

07.03.2026 18:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

I mean, no I don't think so? It's money though not filament. But the $30 plus reward for user is pretty generous here.
Also, lol.

06.03.2026 14:18 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Prusa Reward Program | Prusa Knowledge Base If you're a 3D printing enthusiast with both a Prusa Account and a profile on Printables.com, you have a unique opportunity to join the P2P - Prusa to Prusa community reward program (P2P Program). Own...

Oh this? help.prusa3d.com/article/prus...

News to me too, it's different to the actual affiliate programme

06.03.2026 14:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Prusameters? Where you getting those? ๐Ÿค”

06.03.2026 14:10 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Which, I suspect, is why they are less and less related to reality and more related to making other people rich ๐Ÿ’ฐ

03.03.2026 11:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FAFO ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

01.03.2026 23:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

maybe the USA would like to kick hornets nests within missile range of themselves instead next time. Thx. ๐Ÿ˜˜

01.03.2026 23:37 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

an errant fart?

01.03.2026 20:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

is it just me or do the prices make no sense any more.

01.03.2026 16:20 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm not antagonized, just grumpy about the state of the world, sorry if I seem that way. ๐Ÿ˜‚

01.03.2026 16:18 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes - this is all kind of around the point I was trying to make, but somehow in this instance it seems particularly tone deaf on the international stage, or at least to me.

01.03.2026 16:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

some people, yes.

01.03.2026 16:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Still, by evening I'm sure they'll push all that out of the way to report on Farage's hot takes.

01.03.2026 15:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

I will say the BBC is no better.

Priorities, eh?

01.03.2026 15:58 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Americans care more about the 3 military members who were killed than the how many hundred civilians and children that those military have reportedly killed overnight - and that really says a lot doesn't it?

01.03.2026 15:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

big boi

01.03.2026 15:23 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I for one, miss the times when the FIFA Peace Prize meant something.

01.03.2026 15:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 21 ๐Ÿ” 7 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Post image

yikes

01.03.2026 04:22 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

HAHAHAHA

01.03.2026 00:13 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Oxygen free granite, I hope

28.02.2026 23:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm older so knightmare is more my time.

SPELLCASTING

28.02.2026 15:39 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

jfc I'd entirely wiped that from my memory

28.02.2026 15:17 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

28.02.2026 02:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Non zero chance that AI might eventually become sophisticated enough to investigate, charge, lock up Donald Trump.

Seems worth a go.

28.02.2026 01:17 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image
27.02.2026 05:49 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It's an ad hominem, so as much as you like it...it's thoroughly insidious in its current implementation

27.02.2026 01:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

American politicians are double plus unserious.

26.02.2026 20:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm not sure who started using the word "unserious" but it feels like a better word exists as a commonly used opposite to "serious".

Yes I know unserious has been around since 16th century but it should have stayed there. It's an unserious word.

26.02.2026 20:46 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0