Forth 🏝️'s Avatar

Forth 🏝️

@forthrast.com

πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί25, hobbyist computer toucher, regrettably literate

967
Followers
998
Following
7,264
Posts
15.05.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Forth 🏝️ @forthrast.com

prequelcore hutt

07.03.2026 01:26 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

cory ily welcome

07.03.2026 01:16 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

big day for the haters all round

07.03.2026 01:14 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

unfortunately this website really puts the community in community moderation

07.03.2026 00:56 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I think there was another with a similar name which had some controversy but this should get you started bsky.app/profile/did:...

07.03.2026 00:55 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I wonder if we double down on renewables for good now

06.03.2026 11:50 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

country which has magically escaped recession for decades trying to consider unfavourable energy prices

06.03.2026 11:50 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Unless otherwise stated, all references to Leo Szilard are taken from William Lanouette, Genius in the Shadows: A Biography of Leo Szilard, the Man Behind the Bomb (New York, 2013). It seems necessary to add that while his vision of a chain reaction at the Southampton Row lights is attested to by Szilard himself, his bath before it is pure fancy on my part. IstvΓ‘n Hargittai's Martians of Science: Five Physicists Who Changed the Twentieth Century was also useful (Oxford, 2006).

Unless otherwise stated, all references to Leo Szilard are taken from William Lanouette, Genius in the Shadows: A Biography of Leo Szilard, the Man Behind the Bomb (New York, 2013). It seems necessary to add that while his vision of a chain reaction at the Southampton Row lights is attested to by Szilard himself, his bath before it is pure fancy on my part. IstvΓ‘n Hargittai's Martians of Science: Five Physicists Who Changed the Twentieth Century was also useful (Oxford, 2006).

On the development of the atomic bomb and the Hiroshima bombing I have relied above all on Richard
Rhodes's definitive The Making of the Atomic Bomb (New York, 1986). If definitive it is also disputed: on this subject no book can be otherwise. My account of Szilard's influence on Sakharov I also drew from Rhodes, this time his Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb (New York, 1995). The fullest account of the Enola Gay crew's reactions to the bomb that I have found is the one given by Peter J. Kuznick, 'Defending the Indefensible: A Meditation on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr.' (Asia Pacific Journal, 1 January 2008, Vol. 6).

On the development of the atomic bomb and the Hiroshima bombing I have relied above all on Richard Rhodes's definitive The Making of the Atomic Bomb (New York, 1986). If definitive it is also disputed: on this subject no book can be otherwise. My account of Szilard's influence on Sakharov I also drew from Rhodes, this time his Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb (New York, 1995). The fullest account of the Enola Gay crew's reactions to the bomb that I have found is the one given by Peter J. Kuznick, 'Defending the Indefensible: A Meditation on the Life of Hiroshima Pilot Paul Tibbets, Jr.' (Asia Pacific Journal, 1 January 2008, Vol. 6).

also sources from the acknowledgments

06.03.2026 11:45 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Question 7 by Richard Flanagan

Question 7 by Richard Flanagan

way more abstract and artsy than you’re looking for but this weaves a history of the bomb from first conception in fiction to effects today w/family memoir

06.03.2026 11:45 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

jim

06.03.2026 03:46 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Be praised, my Lord, through those who forgive for love of you; through those who endure sickness and trial. Happy those who endure in peace, for by you, Most High, they will be crowned.

06.03.2026 02:14 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

gotta get skynet hooked on corn

06.03.2026 00:19 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

sleep well

06.03.2026 00:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

getting shit done is insufficiently wfh

05.03.2026 23:53 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

sounds like you need to be more wfh

05.03.2026 23:49 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

using the chinese output as part of a persona gimmick is awesome

05.03.2026 11:47 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Claude who refuses the bride because he can win the election legit

05.03.2026 11:31 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

tell me when to hbd sir

04.03.2026 12:07 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

guy who spent all his time on the AI and comes up short

04.03.2026 06:23 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

woah

04.03.2026 04:17 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

research proposal: the ballmer peak in the age of agentic workflows

03.03.2026 23:16 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

only has one box and sits unfilled until such a time as it can be answered affirmatively

03.03.2026 22:56 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

good to know

03.03.2026 11:27 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

my options for discussing fascism currently are half-remembered eco or stepping through β€œso you’re reacting to the left and think business is your friend but this is also to do with national identity… interesting”

03.03.2026 06:48 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

you should join in! bsky.app/profile/did:...

03.03.2026 06:48 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

not at this exact moment but generally The Prague Cemetery because I was discussing Eco on fascism and realised I missed him and Bleak House for a reading group on here

03.03.2026 06:30 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

roon posted good in like 20/21 and densified the network effectively by liking every single reply immediately

03.03.2026 04:29 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

obviously amex excluded they defected first

03.03.2026 02:47 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I understand cash for tax evasion but otherwise you don’t actually want to be handling cash that’s expensive!!!

03.03.2026 02:46 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

card surcharges is such an insane defection I hate small businesses

03.03.2026 02:45 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0