Paula Surridge's Avatar

Paula Surridge

@psurridge

Professor of Political Sociology, University of Bristol British politics, elections, public opinion and (a lot of) political values. SubStack: https://pollingsnippets.substack.com/?r=4a6d0z&utm_campaign=pub-shar

16,698
Followers
562
Following
2,781
Posts
28.08.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Paula Surridge @psurridge

Particularly in a meritotteracy

13.03.2026 12:16 ๐Ÿ‘ 20 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Just going to leave this here

13.03.2026 12:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 18 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I think I like the alternative framing better, when someone is not doing well enough they must be replaced by an otter (admittedly we may lack sufficient otters for this).

13.03.2026 11:54 ๐Ÿ‘ 13 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Hundreds of GPs tell BBC they have never refused a fit note over mental health concerns The number of fit notes issued has been rising, with more than 11.2m approved in England last year.

I don't see how the data or conclusions being drawn are meaningful without a comparison to fit notes for other causes.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

12.03.2026 09:28 ๐Ÿ‘ 10 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ed Davey's next stunt surely

11.03.2026 20:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Ed Davey's next stunt surely

11.03.2026 20:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
a cartoon of a man in a lab coat and tie saying we have bigger problems ALT: a cartoon of a man in a lab coat and tie saying we have bigger problems

I really can't fathom how everyone has managed to get worked up about what image is on a bank note most of us rarely use.

11.03.2026 18:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 28 ๐Ÿ” 5 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Lots of polling out this week, and it is very variable (I think across them three different parties in 2nd place). This is really helpful for understanding the process and for looking for differences in methodology - though differences in sample quality are of course a whole other conversation.

11.03.2026 10:23 ๐Ÿ‘ 28 ๐Ÿ” 9 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I mean two away goals it isn't impossible...

10.03.2026 22:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

At least I didn't get round to that bet on Spurs winning CL and being relegated in the same season.

10.03.2026 21:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 16 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Maybe we should just let them, preferably while those who think they can wrestle a bear do so trackside.

10.03.2026 18:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 19 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Can't wait for proper cricket to start, I want my picnics in the sun as reward for all the nets sessions I've taken my son to since October.

10.03.2026 15:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Spent much of last evening perplexed as you why Sky were running a visit Abu Dhabi ad...eventually figured out I was watching a recording from a few weeks ago ๐Ÿคฆ

10.03.2026 15:09 ๐Ÿ‘ 13 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Any #historians out there with any possible interest in public opinion from 1935 to now? I would be very grateful for anyone willing to chat about how to help historians discover materials in the polling archive. All topics: politics, policy, health, culture, religion #skystorians

10.03.2026 14:35 ๐Ÿ‘ 15 ๐Ÿ” 9 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Fantastic Ralph, congratulations ๐ŸŽ‰

09.03.2026 19:25 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Equally surprised and delighted to win this!

09.03.2026 18:45 ๐Ÿ‘ 55 ๐Ÿ” 7 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 17 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm the same, hate it when there are obvious errors and no VAR but it does feel like there needs to be something similar to 'Umpires call' where the margin is very tight.

07.03.2026 20:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 9 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Today was not the day to see a song lyric and think 'Oh I haven't listened to The Final Cut in a while'

07.03.2026 17:29 ๐Ÿ‘ 6 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I wonder if he would be quite so keen if he saw the data on admissions by ethnicity.

05.03.2026 18:16 ๐Ÿ‘ 65 ๐Ÿ” 3 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A great example of 'catches win matches' - two superb boundary catches for India and a drop by England the difference ๐Ÿ

05.03.2026 17:31 ๐Ÿ‘ 11 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Before the Blue sky crowd left, those on the right were often very happy to roll out 'Twitter is not Britain' but now it mostly agrees with them they seem to have forgotten this completely

05.03.2026 17:28 ๐Ÿ‘ 31 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

A little like watching Spurs last season - can't say I'm not entertained

05.03.2026 16:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I was very happily impressed yesterday...just no need for this today

05.03.2026 14:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is not really the afternoon viewing I was hoping for ๐Ÿ

05.03.2026 14:47 ๐Ÿ‘ 11 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

It is the standard BPC wording on uncertainty - and from what I know of the BPC I imagine it was extremely difficult to find something that was both accurate enough and acceptable to all members.

04.03.2026 18:13 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It isn't helpful to you or I, but it does signal uncertainty to someone without any statistical training and ought to disuade journalists from talking about changes of 1-2% as if they are shifts in the public mood.

04.03.2026 14:02 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

The key is there is no calculation being done here, an error level for a sample size has been taken as an estimate and applied to all groups. They are using this (taken from BPC website) and showing it graphically

04.03.2026 13:57 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Completely correct for a statistical margin of error but that isn't what they are showing, they are using a fixed +/- as described in the footnote and I think following the wording that was agreed with the BPC. It helps to signal uncertainty but is very unhelpful for people teaching statistics!

04.03.2026 13:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 9 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thank you I will look into this.

04.03.2026 09:50 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Which is exactly why Labour got off on completely the wrong foot with the WFA they didn't grasp the values signal it sent and that values impact economics too.

04.03.2026 07:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 9 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0