Marcus Crede's Avatar

Marcus Crede

@marcuscrede

Grumpy IO psychologist with an interest in research methods, meta-science and personality. Views are my own and not those of my employer. Begrawe my hart op Klein Tambotieboom en strooi my as oor die Bosveld horison

1,204
Followers
394
Following
670
Posts
21.08.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Marcus Crede @marcuscrede

This is so cool because even a complete R coding idiot like myself can follow along. Thank you so much!!

06.03.2026 02:55 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yup! I have an early draft of their original paper and it is nuts to read that. Carney sent it to me when I contacted her to inquire about the non-significant chi-square value that they reported as significant. That's when the whole power posing crisis started. Somehow I was framed as the bad guy.

05.03.2026 01:39 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology

I wrote about this issue here:
open.lnu.se/index.php/me...

04.03.2026 21:01 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Important to remember that neither the original power posing researchers nor almost all of the replicators could be bothered to include a neutral pose control condition and that any effective on feelings was almost entirely due to the -ve effects of a contractive pose.

04.03.2026 19:33 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Ha! The original Lancet article on the dangers of reading in bed is here: doi.org/10.1016/S014...

03.03.2026 18:18 👍 128 🔁 67 💬 6 📌 11

If you contact an APA journal to note that multiple papers by the same authors claim that 2+2=7 and that all of their inferences are based on this claim what will follow is a year-long "investigation" followed by a correction noting that 2+2=4 but that the inferences are unchanged.
Science!

03.03.2026 18:41 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I just received an e-mail suggesting that I follow Snoop Dog on LinkedIn. Does this mean that I am cool?

03.03.2026 02:17 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

True but I also would not have wanted to witness Trump and the Ayatollah resolving conflict the way that Bonobos do.

03.03.2026 01:39 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Definitely. I am very confident that other journals would publish this. I was naive enough to think that the journal that published the meta-analysis would see that they should publish what is essentially a major correction to work that they published.

02.03.2026 03:14 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Good point! We've appealed already but asking for a retraction might not be a good follow-up.

01.03.2026 23:44 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Today the APA journal that published that meta-analysis rejected our commentary - primarily because our findings were not interesting enough. What the actual fuck!

01.03.2026 20:39 👍 19 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 1

We recently submitted a commentary on a very influential meta-analysis. We found that: 1) 40% of relevant literature had not been identified because of lazy search, 2) a few large N included studies did not meet stated inclusion criteria, and 3) that almost all sig. moderator findings were wrong.

01.03.2026 20:39 👍 24 🔁 7 💬 1 📌 1
Preview
How can the use of different modes of survey data collection introduce bias? An introduction to mode effects using directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) Abstract. Survey data are self-reported data collected directly from respondents by a questionnaire or an interview and are commonly used in epidemiology.

Users of survey data, lovers of DAGs, and general methodological enthusiasts, gather round!

I'm so excited to share this new paper, joint work with my brilliant colleagues @rjsilverwood.bsky.social, @pwgtennant.bsky.social, and Liam Wright.

🧵

28.01.2026 12:12 👍 73 🔁 30 💬 4 📌 7

Is there no informed consent form for this? This feels very dodgy. Is there IRB approval for this study?

27.02.2026 18:47 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Pfft. Mathematically impossible results are not a problem at all. Simply send them to the Journal of Management. They give awards for that kind of stuff.

26.02.2026 19:49 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

i paid around $2.5 a few days ago.

25.02.2026 02:21 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
a fluffy cat is sitting on a table and says `` i 'm feeling sick '' . ALT: a fluffy cat is sitting on a table and says `` i 'm feeling sick '' .

Plan to take the next day off from work if you are going to get the pneumonia vaccine. Ask me how I know.

25.02.2026 02:07 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Amazing!!

24.02.2026 19:40 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Thank you! Will do my best to integrate this into my yearly research methods course.

23.02.2026 18:00 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
10  Sequential Analysis – Improving Your Statistical Inferences This open educational resource contains information to improve statistical inferences, design better experiments, and report scientific research more transparently.

The lack of uptake of sequential analysis shows how irrational scientists are, and how their methods are driven by norms. Sequential analyses give you more flexibility and are more efficient than a single hypothesis test, and yet, they are still very rare. lakens.github.io/statistical_...

23.02.2026 16:59 👍 11 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 0
Video thumbnail

This is the most incredible footage of blue whales I’ve ever seen

22.02.2026 08:55 👍 6917 🔁 2268 💬 98 📌 417

The best way to make a small fortune is apparently to start with a big fortune and buy an old house. Unfortunately, I did not start with a big fortune.

22.02.2026 23:18 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

This is completely bonkers.

19.02.2026 23:51 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Like a public autopsy - just more gruesome.

19.02.2026 21:36 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Been keeping track - 8 more review invitations accepted since this post (11 days ago).

19.02.2026 20:28 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Child Personality Moderates Associations Between Parenting and Relational and Physical Aggression Although negative parenting strategies are a risk factor for relational and physical aggression, research has not previously investigated whether child personality traits moderate the association b...

A case of nominative determinism in research focus among academics?
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

19.02.2026 18:51 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

But can you do that via a correction or does it require a retraction?

19.02.2026 18:11 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

What should journals do for papers that: 1) examine an interesting question, 2) but get the analysis wrong so that the conclusion changes from "evidence of effect" to "no evidence of effect" when error is corrected, and 3) the title of the paper states "evidence of effect".
Can a title be corrected?

19.02.2026 17:06 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

The article states that the data is "openly available" but it turns out that this is not the case. Why?

17.02.2026 18:58 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

Babbage, 1830, discussing the problem that scientists selectively report findings that they want to be true.

Confirmation bias is a strong human tendency. This is why we need to design science in a way that prevents conformation bias from leading us away from the truth.

14.02.2026 16:32 👍 43 🔁 14 💬 3 📌 1