Wir sind eines von besagten sechs Teilprojekten. #sfb1472
@c02.sfb1472.uni-siegen.de
Exploring how patient-generated data re/shape doctor-patient relationships. Investigating the impact of wearable, app & platform data on medical authority, patient agency & professional knowledge. https://tinyurl.com/c02sfb1472
Wir sind eines von besagten sechs Teilprojekten. #sfb1472
Madeleine Akrich shows in โFrom Communities of Practice to Epistemic Communitiesโ (2010) how (online) health groups become epistemic communities that produce their own knowledge. This shifts the view of lay expertise from application to production.
doi.org/10.5153/sro.2152
#layexpertise
In โThe nature of the Netโ (2004), Samantha Adams & Marc Berg reframe the problem of extension: as lay expertise spreads online, the issue becomes one of reliability โ a quality made, not given.
doi.org/10.1108/09593840410542484
#layexpertise
We had a fantastic workshop today with Kate Weiner, Lisa Gerzen & @enricomariapiras.bsky.social! In our Data Sprint, we explored forums where people with obesity, sleep apnoea & ME/CFS discuss tracking devices and (digital) health data. Supported by @sfb1472.uni-siegen.de & funded by @dfg.de.
Harry Collins & Robert Evans argue in "The Third Wave of Science Studies" (2002) that dissolving boundaries between experts & publics risks an unlimited "problem of extension." Their solution: distinguishing interactive from contributory expertise.
doi.org/10.1177/0306...
#layexpertise
โMay the Sheep Safely Graze?โ (1998) by Brian Wynne probes the expert-lay divide, showing how local knowledges โ like farmersโ insights on soil & sheep โ are sidelined. He reframes science as cultural practice that stabilises authority, not universal truth.
doi.org/10.4135/9781...
#layexpertise
In "The Meaning and Significance of Lay Expertise" (2023), Steven Epstein revisits the concept's development, addressing critiques & outlining key dimensions, highlighting lay expertise as a hybrid, collective fusion of experiential & formal knowledge.
doi.org/10.1093/oxfo...
#layexpertise
Steven Epstein shows in โThe Construction of Lay Expertiseโ (1995) how AIDS activists in the 1980s strategically engaged with experts. A crucial factor was their appropriation of biomedical knowledge to gain credibility, reform trials & reshape biomedicine.
doi.org/10.1177/0162...
#layexpertise
In โOn the Multiplicity of Lay Expertiseโ (2023), Madeleine Akrich & Vololona Rabeharisoa show how patient associations practise evidence-based activism, articulating experiential & credentialed knowledge into expertise that reshapes health politics.
doi.org/10.1093/oxfo...
#layexpertise
โMost People with Long COVID Are Their Own Doctorsโ by @sazanajayadeva.bsky.social & @dalupton.bsky.social (2025) shows vividly how self-help and self-tracking turn patients into experts for themselves while problematising medical authority.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
#layexpertise
After introducing this research project via our past publications, we now start an ongoing thread on a key concept in our work: lay expertise. In the weeks ahead, weโll present classics and brand-new texts we consider central and relevant โ and welcome your comments and suggestions! #layexpertise
Spending this very hot day while listening to very cool talks at the symposium "Therapeutic Encounters with Chatbots: The Social and Ethical Implications of Artificial Therapeutic Agents" (www.college-uaruhr.de/news-events/...), organised by @benjaminmarent.bsky.social and Sebastian Merkel. #sts
Last stop on our journey through the archive: In 2021, we explored how "the popular" has changed - from cultural distinction to measurable attention. The German version of the article we posted some weeks ago is available here (Open Access): doi.org/10.2478/kwg-2021-0027
#SFB1472
How have digital tools shaped medicine - from early expert systems to mobile tech? In Digitalisierung und Gesundheit, the anthology we introduced last week, we explore decades of change from a sociotechnical perspective (in German): www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/9783...
#sfb1472 #digitalhealth
Back to 2022 in our project introduction: What does digitalisation mean for healthcare? The volume "Digitalisierung und Gesundheit" (Digitalisation and Health, in German) explores AI, diagnostics, and care across disciplines: www.nomos-shop.de/de/p/digital...
#sfb1472 #digitalhealth
Moving further back in our project intro, this week we're sharing a report on the 2022 annual conference of Collaborative Research Centre 1472 "Transformations of the Popular", titled "Participation as Challenge".
Full text (in German): doi.org/10.28937/978...
#sfb1472
Looking back at our research, this weekโs spotlight is on misophonia, a diagnosis shaped online, where laypeople and experts co-create medical meaning. We illustrate how communities fight for recognition and define illness. Full text (in German): doi.org/10.1007/s412...
#sfb1472 #digitalhealth
New week, new post in our intro series: What does it mean to be popular today? This article traces how popularity shifted from cultural distinction to measurable attention โ via charts, clicks & likes. Read more: www.mdpi.com/2076-0752/12...
#SFB1472 #OpenAccess
Next up in our intro series: How do laypeople and experts interact in shifting institutions like medicine, politics, and religion? This 2023 special issue maps the terrain of knowledge, power & participation. Full text (in German): doi.org/10.1007/s41244-023-00314-1
#SFB1472 #OpenAccess
Auch wir haben einen Beitrag zur neuen Ausgabe der POP beigesteuert: unsere รberlegungen zu Konvergenzen zwischen Lifestyle-Wearables und zertifizierten Medizinprodukten am Beispiel der Apple Watch, welche im Rahmen des @sfb1472.uni-siegen.de entstanden sind.
On we go with our project intro and another throwback: In 2023, we explored how wearables like Fitbits generate โgrey dataโ โ private, yet popular health info. What makes it popular, what makes it tricky? Full text (in German): doi.org/10.14361/pop...
Continuing our journey backwards with our penultimate publication: This article explores how doctors respond to patient-generated health data from consumer devices. When do they reject, tolerate or integrate such data? Read more: doi.org/10.1111/1467...
Hello Bluesky! Our research project has already been running for 4 years, but since we're new on this platform, weโd like to introduce ourselves. Over the coming weeks, weโll share our findingsโstarting with our latest publication and working backward. Check it out: doi.org/10.1080/1369...
Our project is part of the Collaborative Research Centre (SFB) 1472 โTransformations of the Popularโ, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG). #DigitalHealth #eHealth #mHealth #MedicalAuthority #PatientGeneratedData [3/3]
Wearables, apps & platforms generate more & more body data, shaping how medical knowledge is produced & applied. In our project, 'Digital Body Knowledge. Fault Lines of Problematic Popularity in Health Care', we explore how these developments impact interactions between patients & doctors. [1/3]
We explore opportunities & conflicts arising when patients generate & present their own biomedical data. How do digitalisation & the popularisation of wearables & patient-generated data challenge medical authority? Do they create new ways of legitimising professional expertise? [2/3]