Mike Masnick's Avatar

Mike Masnick

@masnick.com

Techdirt guy. Writes about social media, copyright, free speech, content moderation, civil liberties and stuff like that. Once wrote a paper that may have helped inspire this service & now I'm on its board: https://bit.ly/protocolnotplatform

202,823
Followers
1,508
Following
26,574
Posts
27.03.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Mike Masnick @masnick.com

Yeah, it's a limitation of the technology of reality.

06.03.2026 20:57 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
On business leaders then and now
COWEN: Sure. How were business leaders different back then from the current crop? Clearly, in many, many ways, but what stands out to you, as someone who knows a lot of top business leaders now and who has studied very intensively top business leaders back then?

SORKIN: Oh goodness, I actually think theyโ€™re very similar. I actually think theyโ€™re shockingly similar. Here I am saying that John Raskob feels like Elon Musk. I think that so many of these individuals feel like modern-day characters. Charlie Mitchell, who ran National City, which becomes Citigroup. Charlie was the equivalent of a Jamie Dimon of his time, but maybe looks more akin to a Jensen Huang in terms of just his sunny disposition towards everything all the time.

I think theyโ€™re still driven by the same things, which is, at some level, Iโ€™ve always thought that people are driven by an insecurity, a FOMO, a YOLO kind of a hole that theyโ€™re all trying to fill. Money is just one example of how they measure it all. I donโ€™t think that theyโ€™re all that different, in fact.

COWEN: Do you think theyโ€™re even more woke today?

SORKIN: Are they even more woke today?

On business leaders then and now COWEN: Sure. How were business leaders different back then from the current crop? Clearly, in many, many ways, but what stands out to you, as someone who knows a lot of top business leaders now and who has studied very intensively top business leaders back then? SORKIN: Oh goodness, I actually think theyโ€™re very similar. I actually think theyโ€™re shockingly similar. Here I am saying that John Raskob feels like Elon Musk. I think that so many of these individuals feel like modern-day characters. Charlie Mitchell, who ran National City, which becomes Citigroup. Charlie was the equivalent of a Jamie Dimon of his time, but maybe looks more akin to a Jensen Huang in terms of just his sunny disposition towards everything all the time. I think theyโ€™re still driven by the same things, which is, at some level, Iโ€™ve always thought that people are driven by an insecurity, a FOMO, a YOLO kind of a hole that theyโ€™re all trying to fill. Money is just one example of how they measure it all. I donโ€™t think that theyโ€™re all that different, in fact. COWEN: Do you think theyโ€™re even more woke today? SORKIN: Are they even more woke today?

COWEN: Do you think theyโ€™re even more woke today?

SORKIN: Are they even more woke today?

COWEN: Or is that also the same, that thereโ€™s maybe the appearance of being more woke, but ultimately, attitudes on gender or race are more similar than one might think? Or not?

SORKIN: Oh goodness. Iโ€™m struggling to relate the word wokeness to the 1920s. Interestingly, Carter Glass, who I think I told you before was sort of akin to an Elizabeth Warrenโ€Šโ€”โ€Šthe truth is, he would have been a racist Elizabeth Warren because he was from Virginia. He was trying to bring segregation back to America, in fact.

Iโ€™m not sure how woke these CEOs were at the time. The sort of upstairs-downstairs situation among the elites and the wealth in terms of where they lived and how they lived, and who worked for them and the various servants and othersโ€Šโ€”โ€ŠI donโ€™t think youโ€™d think that they were that woke back then.

COWEN: So thatโ€™s one difference. Did they do philanthropy better? You have the Morgan Library in New York, everything Carnegie did, which seems quite remarkable. Are todayโ€™s wealthy business leaders living up to that track record? Or somehow theyโ€™re failing to?

COWEN: Do you think theyโ€™re even more woke today? SORKIN: Are they even more woke today? COWEN: Or is that also the same, that thereโ€™s maybe the appearance of being more woke, but ultimately, attitudes on gender or race are more similar than one might think? Or not? SORKIN: Oh goodness. Iโ€™m struggling to relate the word wokeness to the 1920s. Interestingly, Carter Glass, who I think I told you before was sort of akin to an Elizabeth Warrenโ€Šโ€”โ€Šthe truth is, he would have been a racist Elizabeth Warren because he was from Virginia. He was trying to bring segregation back to America, in fact. Iโ€™m not sure how woke these CEOs were at the time. The sort of upstairs-downstairs situation among the elites and the wealth in terms of where they lived and how they lived, and who worked for them and the various servants and othersโ€Šโ€”โ€ŠI donโ€™t think youโ€™d think that they were that woke back then. COWEN: So thatโ€™s one difference. Did they do philanthropy better? You have the Morgan Library in New York, everything Carnegie did, which seems quite remarkable. Are todayโ€™s wealthy business leaders living up to that track record? Or somehow theyโ€™re failing to?

Once again, I'd have to argue that the "woke mind virus" seems to be a thing that only effects a certain class of people who seems oddly obsessed over whether or not other people are somehow "woke"

06.03.2026 20:56 ๐Ÿ‘ 146 ๐Ÿ” 19 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 7 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3

The funniest bit. "Claude tried to talk me out of this." I'd say that this is a PEBKAC situation more than an AI situation.

06.03.2026 20:53 ๐Ÿ‘ 107 ๐Ÿ” 8 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 9 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Nothing more hurtful than discovering what you thought was a deep friendship is fake

Nothing more hurtful than discovering what you thought was a deep friendship is fake

Totally normal thing for Senior Counsel at DOJ to tweet out at 2am

06.03.2026 20:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 1737 ๐Ÿ” 216 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 57 ๐Ÿ“Œ 62

Then who's going to fire Markwayne's pilots?

06.03.2026 20:46 ๐Ÿ‘ 191 ๐Ÿ” 10 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 12 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Maybe this is just me, but I kind of think massive military operations, in which we're demanding unconditional surrender as the outcome, probably should be authorized by Congress.

06.03.2026 15:00 ๐Ÿ‘ 3204 ๐Ÿ” 559 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 120 ๐Ÿ“Œ 31

it's insane that my country's current position is that, if we don't like the leader of a sovereign nation, not only do we get to kill them we get to pick their successor

06.03.2026 16:49 ๐Ÿ‘ 2483 ๐Ÿ” 410 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 120 ๐Ÿ“Œ 38

They think, or at least pretend to think, that this doesnโ€™t sound like obvious cope to everyone in the world

Itโ€™s an entire White House comms shop built on the premise of โ€œmy hot girlfriend lives in Canadaโ€ being believed by normal people

06.03.2026 18:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 2059 ๐Ÿ” 331 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 91 ๐Ÿ“Œ 14

Now that they're trying to pretend their war is not a war, they've gone back to calling it the Defense Department.

06.03.2026 16:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 3014 ๐Ÿ” 775 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 202 ๐Ÿ“Œ 51

Did you know you can shrug and say "No can do boss" when a court orders you to do something

06.03.2026 15:46 ๐Ÿ‘ 4314 ๐Ÿ” 634 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 47 ๐Ÿ“Œ 8
"I feel liberated," said a top banker. "We can say 'retard' and 'pussy' withtout the fear of getting cancelled... its a new dawn"

"I feel liberated," said a top banker. "We can say 'retard' and 'pussy' withtout the fear of getting cancelled... its a new dawn"

We should never ever forget why they did it

06.03.2026 16:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 3424 ๐Ÿ” 713 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 43 ๐Ÿ“Œ 48
Post image Post image

nyt website currently resembles one of those mock covers people made before 2016 election: economy floundering, war in the middle east, scandal-plagued cabinet sec, brazen corruption....

06.03.2026 16:25 ๐Ÿ‘ 2092 ๐Ÿ” 456 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 38 ๐Ÿ“Œ 17
Post image

This is not good.

06.03.2026 13:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 8452 ๐Ÿ” 3365 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 700 ๐Ÿ“Œ 434

there's a thing I like to call "load-bearing assumptions", that you don't notice until they're suddenly gone (e.g the air you breath has oxygen in it).

the post-ww2 order is a load-bearing assumption for basically the entirety of american life. trump took a sledgehammer to it in the last 90 days.

06.03.2026 17:44 ๐Ÿ‘ 3005 ๐Ÿ” 763 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 52 ๐Ÿ“Œ 32
Preview
The Most Chilling Detail in the U.S. Attack on an Iranian Naval Ship The Iranian warship was taking part in an international exercise with many other countriesโ€”including the United States.

This is a chilling crime. A shame on our country. The Iranian ship was unarmed. The US knew this. The sailors were murdered by our navy, and the survivors were left to die at sea.
newrepublic.com/post/207429/...

06.03.2026 12:29 ๐Ÿ‘ 8586 ๐Ÿ” 4148 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 505 ๐Ÿ“Œ 593

In that scenario, it's likely Bluesky would be powering Twitter.

06.03.2026 19:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

nostr may be ideologically pure, but how many users does it have?

06.03.2026 19:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 43 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Maybe I'm a bit slow, but "the other ideology"? What?

From the context, it looks like his concern is Bluesky "the company," but it ignores all the steps the company has taken to keep the protocol open and truly separate from the company, while still making it useful.

06.03.2026 19:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 95 ๐Ÿ” 8 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 9 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Had some more thoughts on the latest between Anthropic and the Defense Department. The story is less about the specifics, and more about the way Anthropic now feels it needs to act to grovel before the Trump admin.

06.03.2026 19:29 ๐Ÿ‘ 54 ๐Ÿ” 14 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

So, the only thing I'll say about this is that when I look at this picture I see an expression that my Dad makes, which reinforces (yet again) that I continue to become my Dad a bit more every day (which is not bad, he's always been a good dude).

06.03.2026 18:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 109 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This was a different sort of episode, but was a really enjoyable and interesting discussion.

06.03.2026 18:56 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

The messy relationship between the media and how companies do Trust & Safety has fascinated me since working in early 2010 newsrooms.

So I enjoyed going deeper into with @masnick.com in special episode of Ctrl-Alt-Speech โ€”ย The (Content Moderation) Eras Tour (apologies to all Tay-Tay fans)

[1/x]

06.03.2026 17:41 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 2 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Preview
Free Press Condemns ICE Arrest of Colombian Journalist Seeking Political Asylum The Nashville reporterโ€™s detention by federal immigration officials poses a grave threat to press freedom and the publicโ€™s right to know.

Nashville reporter's detention by federal immigration officials poses grave threat to press freedom and the publicโ€™s right to know. A thread on Estefany Rodriguez: www.freepress.net/news/free-pr...

06.03.2026 15:53 ๐Ÿ‘ 106 ๐Ÿ” 46 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
US Employers Unexpectedly Cut Jobs, Unemployment Rises
February data call labor market stabilization narrative into question

US Employers Unexpectedly Cut Jobs, Unemployment Rises February data call labor market stabilization narrative into question

Congrats to everyone who voted for Trump and a Republican Congress "for the economy." This is what you get, a sputtering job creation engine that can't make progress like before and keeps rolling backwards.

www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

06.03.2026 15:20 ๐Ÿ‘ 1093 ๐Ÿ” 284 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 48 ๐Ÿ“Œ 36

โ€œHe says what the rest of us are thinking!โ€

06.03.2026 00:55 ๐Ÿ‘ 1194 ๐Ÿ” 136 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 52 ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Preview
New York considers bill that would ban chatbots from giving legal, medical advice | StateScoop A bill under consideration in New York would provide a private right of action, allowing people to file lawsuits against chatbot owners who violate the law.

The latest NY chatbot bill would bar chatbots from conveying information that could fall within the scope of a licensed profession.

Itโ€™s basically a censorship bill disguised as licensure protection.

statescoop.com/new-york-bil...

06.03.2026 05:03 ๐Ÿ‘ 96 ๐Ÿ” 18 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 31 ๐Ÿ“Œ 24

Who will you blame when you don't get the job?

06.03.2026 04:53 ๐Ÿ‘ 45 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm a couple days late to this, but... neat!

06.03.2026 04:47 ๐Ÿ‘ 74 ๐Ÿ” 12 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 1

Markwayne Mullin never served in US military, but often speaks as if he did www.theguardian.com/us-news/live...

06.03.2026 03:10 ๐Ÿ‘ 1554 ๐Ÿ” 320 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 102 ๐Ÿ“Œ 20

โ€œSlurs filled a chatโ€ is a beaut

06.03.2026 02:52 ๐Ÿ‘ 1596 ๐Ÿ” 196 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 36 ๐Ÿ“Œ 8