Fr. Jonathan's Avatar

Fr. Jonathan

@fatherjonathan

Catholic priest. Writer. Special needs dad. Star Trek and comics nerd. Former rapper. Inventor of the question mark.

369
Followers
113
Following
719
Posts
18.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Fr. Jonathan @fatherjonathan

Not really. I think I make marginally more on the paperback than ebooks, but not enough to make a huge difference. Honestly, I'm just happy to have people read it!

07.03.2026 00:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm sorry to hear you've had bad experiences! Yes, I talk about scrupulosity, as well as just generally how to approach the Sacrament if you've had a bad experience with it in the past.

06.03.2026 23:44 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Available now at your favorite digital store! Face to Face with Mercy: Encountering God's Love in the Confessional by Fr. Jonathan Mitchican

Or if you prefer to get it from somewhere other than the 'Zon, here's a link to get it at a number of different stores. books2read.com/facetofacewi...

06.03.2026 23:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm thrilled to announce the release of my new book, Face to Face with Mercy: Encountering God's Love in the Confessional. It responds in plain language to the questions many people ask about the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

06.03.2026 23:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 8 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Rad is a fun word. What do you find enduring and compelling about Jesus?

06.03.2026 08:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Given all the anti Latino racism of the last year, anti Muslim bigotry feels almost retro. It's like the vinyl of hatred.

04.03.2026 04:08 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I can understand that. I guess for me the massive diversity of thought and experience among Catholics is part of the appeal. Plus, Jesus is just really rad.

04.03.2026 03:58 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm realizing, for better or worse, that I have trouble easily being a part of a group theologically, politically, philosophically, etc, because deep in my bones is the need to question everything but also to listen to everyone. Not sure if this is a good or bad tendency in myself, but there we are.

04.03.2026 00:12 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Hmm. Maybe this is just too limited a format to get the full argument. I've always felt that Barron got the transcendentals right, but I'm open to persuasion. Is there something you've written elsewhere that I should read?

03.03.2026 18:24 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Why is that bad though? I get what Barron is doing. I don't understand the criticism of it.

03.03.2026 18:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Is there a context to this that I'm not getting?

03.03.2026 00:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not sure if that's good or bad. Lol.

28.02.2026 02:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Conservative in a very specific direction, which was pretty much directly opposite of the Anglican tradition that formed me. But it's hard for me to get too ruffled about it from this side of the Tiber.

28.02.2026 02:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Not sure exactly when I lost control of my class today on what makes a person, but this happened.

28.02.2026 02:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Uber reformed, Sacraments are basically nothing, that sort of thing.

28.02.2026 02:09 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Independent religious, human rights & legal-aid organizations should have regular access to federal immigrant detention centers, including & especially those privately operated. Humane conditions & treatment need to be verified. Assertions that everything is fine are not enough.

26.02.2026 23:18 ๐Ÿ‘ 69 ๐Ÿ” 32 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

He was very nice when I met him years ago too. Absolutely unhinged theology, but very nice.

27.02.2026 01:59 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Basic hygiene is critical.

27.02.2026 01:09 ๐Ÿ‘ 16 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Love this. If anyone wants to play along, name a character, and I'll do the same. DC or Marvel.

27.02.2026 01:06 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Beauty is good though.

25.02.2026 12:16 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

You got it.

25.02.2026 05:18 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It is rapidly becoming one, which is unfortunate because it didn't have to be this way.

24.02.2026 19:37 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
24.02.2026 19:26 ๐Ÿ‘ 6 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

To be fair, he does have a funny name.

23.02.2026 11:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Well as a married man then, I stand by my previous statement. Lol.

23.02.2026 05:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

There are a few episodes that people have taken the laugh track out and posted on YouTube. Amazing how utterly not funny it is when you do that.

23.02.2026 01:13 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

That said, I think the best modern books on this are "By Whose Authority" by Gaillerdetz and "Magisterium" by Avery Dulles.

23.02.2026 01:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I would say that this is so, though moral teaching tends to fit in a slightly different box. But a person for instance who was perfectly on board with the Nicene Creed but said that coveting your neighbor's goods is fine would be hard to label as orthodox.

23.02.2026 01:09 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

But they didn't use the word "orthodox"... or am I missing something?

23.02.2026 01:04 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes, I get that they see them that way. My point is more that the critique of the implementation of Vatican II isn't some fringe idea. It comes largely from people who were at the Council, heavily influenced by it, or in positions where they worked to implement it themselves.

20.02.2026 05:02 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0