Zak of the Noog

I would hope most didn’t

Yeah no worries I won’t keep prying haha. I took a similar exit, but because I was on my 3rd enlistment my first 2 were completed honorably and I got full benefits. My final enlisted was registered as general, which is a notch down from honorable. I think ‘other than honorable’ is pretty common tho.

Fair enough, did he do less than a full enlistment?

A dishonorable for weed? It might not have been honorable but it’s very hard to get a dishonorable.

Someone force you to read Jordan Peterson? lol

You would do the same if losing meant accountability for some heinous crimes.

It’s anti-anybody who ain’t Christian, not sure why you singled out Jewish people here.

It kinda feels like it applies to everyone that isn’t non-Jewish European. If it’s solely directed at Jewish folk, it’s hard for me to tell how.

He doesn’t have a clean exit like he does with tariffs. That’s scary.

Shrinkage, shoplifting is an explanation for shrinkage that absolves the store manager of the most culpability

My first thought. He ain’t wrong but his vision seems to only go one way.

It seems more likely that he realized the Epstein shit and was forced into it by Russia

Oh as someone who as lived in red states his whole life, I can assure you he does represent a pretty good chunk. Probably not a majority but it doesn’t take a majority to win.

That has always been true since he came onto the scene. The destruction of USAID is the single most destructive thing any president has done to this country.

Good, so why say what you said?

I’m not sure why you’re misrepresenting the argument, but that is not correct. I am arguing about bad faith arguments made about the crowd makeup to delegitimize the cheering.

My point is that pointing out that it’s all women is an attempt to say that’s the only reason they are cheering louder, the implication being that a room full of men would do the opposite.

It’s also sad and hilarious that I’m sure they are trying to explain basic things to him like “no, Mr President we can’t just nuke them. That would lead to the end of the world.”

I kinda don’t. Everything I read and listen to said the opposite from the start

I’m not saying you’re trying to do that? I’m saying the person on TikTok who posted it is

They are attempting to delegitimize the reaction by claiming they were:

1. There for a guy.
2. Only cheering for them because they were women.

What is a Bluesky argument mean to you? Where you say something unverifiable and I say that?

The type of person who thinks to look into that isn’t trustworthy to report it.

… you think the audience was 90% female at SNL? lol

White supremacy, actually and “owning the libs”

If the leaders aren’t doing a good job they should be replaced. Doesn’t feel deranged to say.

Lol Epstein doesn’t exist? On what world?

Adorable

Right? Real support means letting them have the glory they've worked a lifetime for without making yourself the headline. Your job there is to be a supportive prop for their achievement, not to hijack the podium.

The logic here is fascinating: total silence when the facts are right in front of them, but total outrage the second they can attach a Jewish person or a democrat to a headline. It's not about the crimes; it's about who they want to be guilty.