zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
z
i recommend capitalist realism if you haven't read it! it's extremely readable, and it's a foundational text to the online left, but also it's a good entry point to CCRU which helps in understanding strains of the right. i read it 6 years ago and i come back to some passages from it monthly
JFF
#atproto what's the reasoning for bluesky like records containing cid?
snowww
:)
like a fantasy map
this sounds great! but i think for me feature creep is the enemy, and i think if it's simpler, it might be easier for other apps to interoperate (though its probably a worse experience for your users, tradeoffs...)
i think a super simple lexicon with 2 record types: 88x31 blob with a link and like would be nice
i could see it being a nice addition to user profile pages on other atproto apps, to show all the 88x31s they've liked
i had this same idea a few weeks ago! i think it'd be a fun toy site to make if you have a weekend or two
ects/pds$ cat invite-code -epppy
she is sooooooooooooooooooooooooo epppy :3
they should make "brain2" that still likes being perceived, they were cooking with that, but doesnt feel infinite pain at being judged as good or bad; they lost the plot there
yeah i'll add that!
yeah its on my tangled.org/moth11.net
xcvr.org is my project, it's quite similar, more like unix talk, but should be adaptable to ssh-chat
user issues a channel record with a host appview field
host makes an irc-like and issues signet records w/ ref to channel when users start typing
users issue message & media records w/ ref to signet
the part of the docs where it says DONT DO THIS
maybe i should redesign my lexicon & invalidate all old data
Trash 100.37 GB
shellofsilence.wav 94.49GB
my god__________________
(i realize maybe it mentions it on the oauth page but i never read that crap)
oh thats cool! in any case i think an advantage of app passwords here is that you delete them in the same place you create them, so it's more clear to you that you can revoke it
i actually think its much worse because i think its harder to revoke haha
myxcvr app? also some vague thoughts on pds -> app server flow vs app server -> pds flow
myXcr APP is coming along*
*as long as i dont let myself worry much about the third 90%
However, the AT in atproto stands for "Authenticated Transfer" meaning that if you're technically inclined (and it's getting easier), you can transfer your information from one piece of paper to another and anyone can authenticate that both pieces of paper are made by the same person
in practice you delegate trust to different webapps like bsky.app or deer.social, allowing them to "write to your piece of paper" for you, and they are able to ban users that they feel violate their terms of use
so whereas most social media platforms have total control over one database system that only they have access to, in atproto everyone has their own database
this is what is written in yours:
pdsls.dev/at://did:plc...
in most parts of the internet, you tell a website things, and it writes them down on a piece of paper that only it can look at
in atproto, you write things down on a piece of paper that only you can write on, and any website can look at what you wrote down
its not by default, but oauth scopes is currently being worked on which allows you to determine which lexicons a session can interact with
i think unfortunately scopes is a bit incomplete because this doesnt allow two applications to interoperate with the same lexicon unless you fully trust both
AND THEY SAY SHE FELL OFF
Beep9
Beep8