I know it's a minor issue, but as part of a larger "Truth & Reconciliation" moment, I want this guy's identity to be revealed and then get dragged in front of the cameras and be forced to explain why being able to say slurs made him a better banker.
I love watching people use LLMs in public. They’ll reply to a breaking news article and say “@grok is this true?” Babe where do you think it’s about to pull its answer from
I *think* he means the rules of engagement were too restrictive because they minimized the amount of harm the military could do. I hope someone sets his head on fire.
But we don't know what the thoughts are, and it'd be really gross and bad to expect people, or even journalists, to explain them to our satisfaction.
I don't quite know how else to put it. I can't see how "Should Jamelle Bouie be following *these* people?" resolves into anything useful or good.
Honestly, I think it's pretty bad and also very unnecessary to police what individuals choose to read based on what you yourself just said are generalizations.
Is he engaging a lot with them or promoting them? Because conflating following with those things is not a road we should go down.
From the new Epstein drop
Okay, not sure this is real.
Typical sexism- Trump fires the first female DHS secretary??? 🙄🙄We can't let him get away with this fam 🤬 Kristi Noem welcome to the resistance
Restrictive and minimalist, huh
They should make a TV show that's just more of Better Call Saul. Only it's not more seasons of Better Call Saul because the story was the correct length, and it's not rewatching Better Call Saul because it's new content, and it's not a spinoff, but it's still somehow more of Better Call Saul. Yknow?
this post deserves to be presented to you by having an index card moved down word by word with photos taken of your face after every new reveal
Did he run away successfully? The people want vengeance.
"…child." 😳
if you find yourself without an activity to occupy your time here in a couple hours, you can listen to my guitarist and i talk about music on the radio in less contentious ways than normal men having been doing so today
"A better world is possible" used to be an uplifting message about the dream of creating a better future.
Now it is just a straightforward statement. Like…FOR SURE a better world is possible. This stupid shit we are up to now definitely isn't the best we can do. Not even close.
Truly pretty gross to eliminate the public editor position a decade ago and now replace it with a faceless account that literally has "PR" in the handle. The old position served the readers; this one serves the NYT as a business.
I love that the NYT hired a professional "ackhtually" Karen
If I were Zelensky, I'd say yes but JD Vance has to come and ask in person in his politest voice on national TV.
I'm not sure "Got My Mind Set on You" is problematic, exactly, but if it takes that much money and time to be with this person, I think you should reevaluate and focus on dating someone who actually likes you.
He's handsome enough but also looks trustworthy, kind, and considerate and like he's willing to be emotionally vulnerable eventually.
Agreed
Smoldering is nice, but bland reliability is solid gold.
Kristi Noem has done a stunning amount of damage and it’s good she’s gone.
But this doesn’t change the fact that we need a complete overhaul of DHS, impartial investigations into the killings of two American citizens, and information on children that were taken from Minnesota.
Napoleon low key the funniest guy in European history because he was like “what if I promoted officers based on how good they were at army and recruited troops who actually liked my country“ and it was basically the same as unleashing Godzilla.
BREAKING:
The Justice Department just posted online three FBI interviews that had been missing from the massive trove of Epstein files initially released.
They're related to unsubstantiated sexual assault allegations against Donald Trump.
DOC 1: www.justice.gov/epstein/file...
"At least he tells it like it is."
