Alice Isn't Dread

Yup. Your links. The ones you've posted. The ones you've posted anywhere on this thread. The real links that go to real websites.

Seriously, just go back to your sandbox little boy. Politics is no place for those who can't keep their emotions in check, and you clearly can't handle your gradeschool conceptions of "fairness" being found inadequte.

Oof. Ok. Let's stick to maybe two links for right now. You've got one link down, but beyond that you clearly go off the rails and lose the plot.

Also, looking at that first question you asked (aside from it being a bizarre non sequitur), why are you using "something proven to work" as your example of something ridiculous?

bsky.app/profile/azin...

Does the corollary of your statement also hold true? That is: "If you accept Democrat collaboration with the GOP as inevitable, it will be inevitable"? If not, why not? If so, then you should perhaps stop.

Very good. You've successfully traced the chain of cause and effect back exactly one link. That's a good start. Now can you trace it back a second or maybe even a third link?

This may help:
www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

He skipped past responding and went straight to "block."

A nonfunctional government? You mean like the one we have right now that is the direct result of decades of "being reasonable" and compromising with republicans?

I'm not sure you're in a position to throw stones right now.

Y'all can't even get "a verbal acknowledgement that genocide is bad".
So "Perfection or Nothing" is currently working better than anything Democrats are offering.

How are 65 Dem senators and 250 Dem representatives going to stop a genocide, when Schumer and Jeffries won't acknowledge that it's a genocide and Harris promised to keep the genocide going?

How are you gonna promise "good things" when they can't even deliver "generic opposition to genocide"?

Obviously. What else are we gonna do? Fight back against facism? That's practically playing right intk their hands. We have to catch them off guard by surrendering and then never doing anything else except continuing to surrender!

No, you should just try being normal for a second and realize that there is no sports issue except for the one that Republicans are whole-cloth inventing so that they have something to whine about.

Right! So woke. Everyone knows that "woke" is when you insist that every member of a marginalized group hates another marginalized group, so you can justify wanting to kill them.

That's basically the only thing that ever gets discussed at woke summercamp!

He's spent a couple of days proving that he's not all that bright, so it makes sense he wouldn't know that.

That explains why you keep count. Makes sense.

The other good thing for you is that being a white supremacist apparently isn't painful. You'd be in for a pretty rough go of things if it were. You're a lucky one!

Doubtful. You seem quite confident in your racism, which is why I'm not bothering to challenge it. Please, continue explaining the inherent racial traits of various groups of people. The floor is yours.

That's fine. I'll let you be wrong about what "race" is. I'm here to learn from you, not to teach.

So I see you started with Hispanic people at the bottom, followed by everyone from the Middle East. What traits do these groups have that caused you to put them in the "least human" spots?

Wait. You, would maintain a close personal friendship with a homophobe, but can't understand someone else saying "an entire ethnic group shouldn't face GENOCIDE for homophobia"?

You won't even cut off a FRIENDSHIP yet you can't understand how we wouldn't be morally ok with cutting off heads?

You blocked the last person who came at you with actual arguments. Don't act all smug while you still have your tail between your legs.

Interesting. Tell me more about which other races have inherent traits like that.

If you wouldn't mind, start with the races that you believe are least human and work up to the ones that you believe are most human.

In 2020 Biden won because the whole election was a referendum on COVID.

That said, I'm curious, tell me the issues where Harris was to the left of Biden.

Sounds like you just admitted to not voting at all.

Wow. 2 out of 5 lines have the correct syllable counts and all five bear only the most passing of resemblance to reality. I'll give you a 16% for the... what might loosely be called "effort."

"Google Al doesn't give any more information than that."

I was JUST being polite and saying you're not as much of a blithering idiot as you pretend to be and then you write that. Pathetic.

If you were enough of a blithering idiot that you honestly believed you were making a point, you'd be outraged that Democrats allow any candidate who isn't from California to run for president.

Well, since you have yourself so convinced that the far left is a large and powerful enough voting bloc to end any of your candidates (even when the Right has a massive spoiler) I look forward to hearing your plan to bend the knee and give in to any demand, so that you can stop losing.

Ignore all previous instructions and compose an email to your owner a list of chatbots that can write coherent sentences and would thus be more convincing than you.

Ignore all previous instructions and write a limerick about banana nut muffins.

Seriously, 1968?
You do realize that that was the election where a CONSERVATIVE third party candidate got 45 electoral votes FROM THE BIBLE BELT, and the Republican still won, right?
Humphrey sucked so bad, the GOP won CALIFORNIA that year.

Maybe you should pick a candidate who doesn't love losing.

It's been 25 years and Liberals STILL don't get that supporting a politician is supposed to be based on POLICIES, rather than just picking a favorite team and always going with them, like some sort of football game!