5. Additional things it doesnt handle well, sibling/sequences, because it just throws into queue for async, you dont have any real source of truth of process.
6. queued messages arent supported in persistence, requires custom workaround
5. Additional things it doesnt handle well, sibling/sequences, because it just throws into queue for async, you dont have any real source of truth of process.
6. queued messages arent supported in persistence, requires custom workaround
3. a lot of minor bugs, such as xai, no tracking usage, lack of consistency between the providers.
4. attachments and tool calls, because this is using persistence db now, all of these are in LARGE meta json columns. This should be relationships. You going to fit 100 tool calls in meta? not great
1. Cant dynamically override steps, need to create a gateway extension because its designed to use statistically typed configs
2. Persistent threads/messages, this was a bad idea, this should be on the application, far too many workarounds on this one to track the correct data for given application.
After further battle testing this. Im not impressed. You have to make too many workarounds to get the features you want to extend or change configurations. I'm now deciding if I should change back to Atlas because this isn't a great package. Good start, bad execution.
I wonder if they will use Prism or replace it as a first-party solution, thats what I'm more interested in, because theres 2 parts to this. One being providers, which is API related SDK with that unified API, the biggest maintenance burden. The second part is the structure around agents/tools.
TIL about the `<var>` element:
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/W...
No way. Tell me more
This is crazy cool.
i tried a 3d version, looks cool but doesnt really make it less chaotic π
please add gifs
Really can not wait @benstiller.redhour.com! I need to know what happens next, itβs been yearsβ¦
I must ask. What kind of feed watching app you got going on there?
π
Happy Birthday @danielroe.dev ! π₯³
Let's build together go.bsky.app/CUmM1XS
They donβt need to pay for ads. Just post content itself, it wouldnβt be forced exposure, so who knows if itβs effective. But I could see esp live style brands doing it. In some way, itβs already happening.
This is actually really cool service. π
What software you use to create them? My current designer exports them to Lottie for use on vuejs.
Nice work! The future of websites is to make them more app-like. The need for people to learn and do animations is growing. Keep it up! Would love to see me.
As a product guy, I love interactivity for the user. Itβs so frustrating when devs give me buttons or navigations that feel like static images. This is really nice, takes it up a level! π₯
I agree. Facebook has just been cluttered with fake posts now. And the comments are not productive, just everyone saying βgod blessβ or βamenβ over and over as if theyβre all bots
So true. Competition is SO important. Finally someone moving the needle. and itβs not big tech
One word do trick.
Literally semantics βhave a dedicated page on their website where it says how many user numbers they have in the EU and where they are legally establishedβ
Love the shirt!
@keithedwards.bsky.social do you sleep?
You guys are crushing it! πͺ π
Again? @benstiller.redhour.com
Nice work @aoc.bsky.social! looks cold over there in NY! π₯Ά