YAC (Yet Another Cam)'s Avatar

YAC (Yet Another Cam)

@sincerely.cam

we've all got good things to do and it's good when we do them website @ cam.fyi

1,673
Followers
913
Following
11,346
Posts
09.04.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by YAC (Yet Another Cam) @sincerely.cam

I will simply VPN

06.03.2026 14:57 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

This is a bad bill

06.03.2026 13:30 πŸ‘ 61 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Saw her name on a magazine and did a double take, had to google

05.03.2026 20:12 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 1

makes sense we get along

05.03.2026 02:29 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

My terminal colors are slightly different

05.03.2026 01:47 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Did a double take realizing that everyone works with the exact same interface now

05.03.2026 01:47 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Look i know ai is "not sentient" but like, if you went back in time to the 90s and told someone about this, they would tell you you had a sentient robot inside your computer

05.03.2026 00:24 πŸ‘ 118 πŸ” 12 πŸ’¬ 11 πŸ“Œ 1

yeah

just conversation about AI i mean

05.03.2026 01:41 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

β€œIt’s a consciousness problem, Michael. How hard could it be?”

04.03.2026 18:39 πŸ‘ 28 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

brother i can see the ball. the ball is exactly half way between you and me. you're telling me it's going to hit me? you must be lying. do i look like i've been hit by a ball?

04.03.2026 22:41 πŸ‘ 70 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

we have reached levels of inability to infer the ball's trajectory never before thought possible

04.03.2026 22:40 πŸ‘ 100 πŸ” 5 πŸ’¬ 5 πŸ“Œ 0

Destroy the boundaries between technical and non technical people. (max may be technical but they didn’t need to be to do this)

04.03.2026 16:17 πŸ‘ 101 πŸ” 4 πŸ’¬ 10 πŸ“Œ 0

My for you feed is just AI, not sure if that’s also true of every other feed I have but too scared to check

05.03.2026 00:38 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The problem is that I struggle to think of another technology that requires people to update their priors as frequently as this.

For people who are already busy in unrelated fields, it's not unreasonable to doubt that things have materially changed in a few months when most tech takes years.

04.03.2026 19:07 πŸ‘ 56 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 5

Humans are not built for a world that changes this quickly.

You have to endure years of grifting about current capabilities
then do an about face when the technology actually crosses that threshold.

Try a task and the LLM fails, 6 months later it's trivial.

04.03.2026 19:14 πŸ‘ 26 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Like it will be easier and easier to β€œhave taste” bc the LLM will have taste for you, more and more, or generate the most tasteful version of the thing you want

05.03.2026 00:37 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 1

Less me giving advice to you and more me giving it to myself!

05.03.2026 00:26 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Crucially, I deeply doubt they’re going to have a come to jesus moment where they fully update their priors

I mean, good to engage them, but not on this topic. I think it’s just time to smile and nod lol

05.03.2026 00:26 πŸ‘ 6 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t think it’s worth engaging with these people anymore. They’re not gonna be convinced in a way that helps them or others before software jobs fundamentally change and they’re forced to adapt

05.03.2026 00:25 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

dario continues to be based

04.03.2026 20:36 πŸ‘ 102 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I think this is true but I also think of vibecode tools as asymptotically similar to a genie who is trying to interpret your wishes correctly, and steadily getting better at it

05.03.2026 00:22 πŸ‘ 17 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

Moral objections to AI feel like moral objections to the weather.

04.03.2026 19:41 πŸ‘ 47 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 9 πŸ“Œ 4

i mostly meant managing swarms of agents

04.03.2026 23:51 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

interested only in a horrific sense. will be avoiding. thanks!

04.03.2026 23:51 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

entering the MMAcevedo universe rapidly

04.03.2026 23:41 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

this was vaguely a you-shaped post

04.03.2026 23:40 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

issues fixable by having a claude explain the joke in the bottom-right of every post like a little cartoonist head

04.03.2026 23:38 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

who is making this?

(claude, eventually)

04.03.2026 23:39 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

hell ya

04.03.2026 23:37 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

wow i missed it

04.03.2026 23:35 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0