Rafael C

> o exército americano é ignorante a esse ponto?

O poder das forças armadas americanas é basicamente:
- equipamento (tecnologia + volume)
- capacidade industrial e logística
- muita grana

Porque em termos de competência da cadeia de comando é muito inferior a muito exército menor.

Baseado.

😅😅

Or, if this was even possible in the first place, thinking Iran would just look at the road being built and go "oh chucks, I guess I'll just do nothing and loose my main strategic advantage".

The construction would be a valid military target and those countries' defenses are already overwhelmed.

Ainda to tentando descobrir quem é mais idiota: esse ou o cara que propôs construir um canal atravessando a península de Musandam.

Por um lado, um quer atravessar uma cadeia de montanhas com um canal.

Por outro, deve precisar uns 20 mil caminhões pra encher um superpetroleiro.

Tô em dúvida.

There's already a network of oil pipelines bypassing the strait of Hormuz, very big ones.

And they carry a small fraction of the volume that ships can carry.

Imagine how much less you could carry on fucking trucks.

Also Iran wouldn't say "oh chucks, they're building a road, I guess I loose my strategic advantage".

Uh... the road construction would be a valid military target and bombed to bits.

Even it was possible to offload that with trucks without bombing, it would be impossible with bombing

Uma estátua que mostra Donald Trump e Jeffrey Epstein abraçados imitando a cena clássica do filme Titanic apareceu em Washington.

Um placa instalada ao pé da instalação artística traduz o relacionamento dos dois como "um história de amor trágica" baseada em "viagens luxuosas".

Pior que eu também nunca tive problema de apetite.

Mais ou menos. Tinha bastante açúcar, era meio xarope.

Tinha um gostão de xarope herbal.

Tipo um Jagermeister mas com açúcar.

Minha mãe comprava porque o povo falava que fazia bem. Eu tomava direto. As vezes direto da garrafa. Era bom demais kkkk.

Minha mãe fazia um troco com biotônico e ovo de pata (???) pra eu tomar. Esse eu não gostava não.

No, no wait. I like this. Hear me out.

We should treat all billionaires as potential nuclear threats. We need to expropriate their funds to avoid them buying nukes from Korea.

Lol....

(That are not on sale, btw)

Oh my god lol. Is Korea selling?

By that logic... any fucking stare is an imminent nuclear threat lol. Anyone could buy one. Zambia is a nuclear threat. Mauritius is a nuclear threat.

Hell many corporations could buy one. Cargill is a nuclear threat. Nestlé is a nuclear threat.

🤣🤣🤣

LLMs have no:

- body
- homeostasis to maintain
- agency + objectives to achieve
- a perception-action loop

Or any of the other characteristics that modern theories of cognition identify as key in the evolution of consciousness in living things.

So yeah. We're pretty sure Claude isn't conscious.

There's quite a bit of evidence that consciousness evolved from the fact that bodies with agency needed to solve problems that bodies with agency have.

If you ask competent researchers in this area you'll hear thet the probability that language models predicting next best token achieve that is zero

Science is far from a complete picture of consciousness and cognition. But our most modern theories (embodied cognition, etc) have already a lot of insight on how it emerges in living beings and how to recognize it.

And none of it is "I talked to it and it looked conscious".

I could go on and on.

Not a single ai passes the PEN TEST #grok #chatgpt #gemini #ai YouTube video by FatherPhi

We also expect conscious beings to be able to model the world, reason about the model and make accurate projections about what will happen when acting upon the world.

It's easy demonstrate that LLMs aren't able to do that.

youtu.be/thKjvF1dZQY?...

They mimic that ability with severe limitations.

For example. We expect conscious beings to reason. LLMs don't reason. They estimate high-probability next tokens.

They consistently fail reasoning benchmarks they were not primed for.

There is no emergent reasoning capability. Just memorization of token patterns that mimic reasoning patterns.

Second of all, we *know precisely and in detail how LLMs work*. At least I do, as a researcher and practitioner in the field of machine learning.

And so, *we know its limitations*. And they are incompatible with the loose characteristics (not a hard definition) we see in conscious beings.

Complex categories are defined as a distribution where phenomena near the center and far away from the center are clearly identifiable as in and out, but near the borders there is ambiguity.

That's like... the most basic assumption of any apt discussion about categories of complex phenomena.

First of all, complex categories are not amenable to be articulated as simple closed definitions, with clear boundaries. I think philosophy of language already established that with questions of the kind "what is furniture?" and "what is a game?".

"Challenge for those who are very confident that chemically-active droplets that move and divide themselves in solution are not living beings: Explain what is a living being?"

You don't need to be able to articulate a complex emergent phenomenon in detail to be able to recognize non instances.

É NÓIS, PORRA!!!
BRASIL NO TOPO.

NÃO AGUENTA BEBE LEITE, SEUS GRINGO HETERO DO CARAIO.

Porra, eu pagava.

Burocracia é um troço que faz eu ficar instantaneamente burro e começar a fazer merda.

Dude sent you a list of from Wikipedia with SEXUAL ASSAULT allegations. The words are literally in the title of the article.

And you responded with that.

Are you pretending to be dumb?

Are you calling RAPE just cheating?

And are you saying that minimizing her husband's victims, enabling his behavior and denying the accusations makes her simply a victim of a cheating husband?

Oh c'mon.

Amém, irmã.