Itβs terrible,
But maybe it is necessary. Maybe new systems can rise out of the compost pile of all the old systems that have been enshittified.
@toddgeist.me
Among other things, building @ottomatic.cloud with TypeScript, Supabase, FileMaker, and an awesome team at proofgeist.com Board member onesparkacademy.org and pacificzen.org. Transformation happens in the dark!
Itβs terrible,
But maybe it is necessary. Maybe new systems can rise out of the compost pile of all the old systems that have been enshittified.
SaaS is dead. It will take 10 yrs to die, but itβs done
Looks like an American Kestral maybe.??
Super cool
Excellent, and thought provoking.
I dunno, it gives me the "I need a whole internet to believe I am amazing, just to drag my ass out of bed in morning vibe"
"Pathetic" is how I would put it
Amazon blocking Perplexity isn't about transaction rules. It's about survival.
Shopify's bet on agent commerce isn't just strategyβit's an existential threat to platform monopolies everywhere.
This threatens every platform built on attention miningβAmazon, Google, DoorDash. The internet consolidated among 5-10 companies. Agent networks could reverse that through infrastructure players with asymmetric incentives.
The proof: Shopify open-sourced the Agentic Commerce Protocol with OpenAI and Stripe. Partnered with Perplexity (yes, the company Amazon blocked). Results: 7x AI traffic, 11x orders since January.
techcrunch.com/2025/11/04/s...
Unlike Amazon, Shopify is infrastructure, not a destination. They profit when merchants succeedβregardless of which interface drives the sale.
While Amazon blocks agents, Shopify is building the rails for them.
Platform monopolies run on attention mining: capture users in a destination β steer them toward max platform profit β consolidation.
AI agents eliminate the destination entirely. No destination = no attention to mine. The business model collapses.
Amazon blocked Perplexity's shopping agent. @dfriedman nailed why: "Enclosure and abstraction cannot peacefully coexist."
But there's more to this storyβand Shopify is making a massive bet on it.
davefriedman.substack.com/p/ai-agents-...
The US AI strategy appears to be light a few trillion dollars on fire.
China's strategy appears to be do way more with way less.
x.com/Kimi_Moonsho...
I'd like to believe that American innovation goes beyond financial speculation and vibes. but it's getting harder to believe.
He seems to be drawn to tacky gold stuff. Maybe this is the staff trying to help him find his way back, when he gets lost.π€ͺ
Well they havenβt cut them out βentirelyβ. I am still going to use switch to sonnet or gpt 5 for some tasks, but the majority of the tokens I am burning are now with composer
Cursor spent 2 years using Anthropic and OpenAI models, collected massive amounts of data and use cases, then trained their own frontier-level model and cut both out entirely.
How is this not the playbook every AI application builder will follow?
Iβve used Cursorβs Composerβitβs legitimately good. Easily on par with Sonnet 4/4.5 and very fast. Makes me wonder if thereβs any moat left for frontier model builders, and might explain why theyβre trying to set $1.4T on fire.
cursor.com/blog/composer
I havenβt thought of that movie in 30 plus years, but I knew it instantly from that one shot. And then I remembered the skeleton fighting scene.
It is really fast, and so far the quality seems pretty good.
And being fast is pretty helpful. Itβs easier to stay focused on whatβs happening, which makes it easier to catch when it makes mistakes
Another very important fact that falls out of this is
You still have to use your brain.
It also explains why some people experience bigger wins than others. Some peopleβs bandwidth was much higher than others. They could type faster and the needed less googling to make shit work.
Those folks donβt get as much out of it as someone like me, who still canβt type with more than 2 fingers
Iβve said it before and Iβll say it again.
The real unlock in this generations AI models is higher Bandwidth
AI radically increases the bandwidth between your brain and the computer. All the wins stem from that.
All the βthe shit doesnβt workβ takes stem from missing this point.
Ok I think βthe Studioβ is not good
ProofChat - Full featured AI Powered Chat embedded in and connected to your FileMaker applications. - www.proofchat.ai
www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZP8...
Thanks for mentioning this. I experience a lot of success.
And if you out there reading this do as well. It's ok. You don't have to feel bad. Other people get to have their own experiences. Just as you do.
Choose joy. And let others do the same.
For me, today, AI Coding brings me a lot of joy!
great article on working with Cursor or other AI coding tools.
anyblockers.com/posts/workin...
But if your chat app, like Claude or Goose, uses tools from an MCP Server, and it fails 1 in 4 times, you can correct it. You can tweak the context and try again.
YOU are the planning and correcting agent.
It's not a perfect system, but it can result in workflows that feel fast and effective.
this becomes even more obvious when you try to build multi-agent systems. If you have three agents that each fail 1 out of 4 times, your system is will only work 4 in 10 times, as the errors compound. .75 x .75 x .75 = .42
If each of these agents hides it memory the system as a whole can't learn.
This article by @goldengatesteve is right on: fully autonomous agents aren't ready for prime time yet.
secondthoughts.ai/p/gpt-5-the-...
BUT Claude or Goose plus MCP servers can be very useful. Part of the reason is that you, THE HUMAN, are kept in the loop. That helps the convo stay on track.
writing code is about as "digital content creation-y" as it gets. so I guess I won't have to pay taxes on my wage... er "tips" I get every 2 weeks
π