We are back, and it is time for This Month in
@solidjs.com 😎
Let's recap what happened since the year started, and obviously tease something you definitely didn't miss
open.substack.com/pub/danieljc...
I’m a ginger with blue eyes who looks Irish but is 100% Italian. I confuse a lot of ppl 😆
I recently contributed a #Solid Query and #SolidStart implementation for Orval (orval.dev). It generates type-safe primitives from OpenAPI.
Enjoy. ❤️🥳
orval.dev/docs/guides/...
orval.dev/docs/guides/...
The <Suspense> is over.
Solid 2.0 Beta is now released (next tag on npm). 🎉
github.com/solidjs/soli...
He’s such a poor representative of the American people. I signed. He needs to go
He’s such a poor representative of the American people. I signed. He needs to go
He’s such a poor representative of the American people. I signed. He needs to go
He’s such a poor representative of the American people. I signed. He needs to go
If you want American Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra out of Canada - sign the Commons petition e-7124
#Canada #cdnpoli
www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en...
I want to replace our badges on Solid Primitives. They keep getting rate limited :(
Is @npmx.dev planning a bundlephobia replacement? Badges? Would really love to see some new options available :)
The Board of Peace seems to be bored of peace 🤔🤦♂️
Post a pic you took, no context, to bring some zen to the feed.
I rather like this idea. The previous sq ft was huge, maybe a smaller footprint is all that’s needed?
It’s a beautiful complex and makes use of the existing structures. Great Lake view and feels futuristic. The price tag is the only concern.
Yeah. I get the point but the escape hatch is to view the raw data chart instead.
Without an official verified source, this seems to be the only way? Building the dataset and crowd sourcing it seems like a reasonable approach.
At minimum clear documentation and a definition of an anomaly needs to be written and clearly visible. A process for redacting or questioning recorded anomalies might be good.
An official statement of who invigilates the submissions and accepts them. Perhaps two-party review mechanism.
👍
My solution is: be very, very clear about how what this process is for (anomalies) to mitigate litigiousness. Setup an approval process that is bulletproof.
One concern I have is, will people start to use this as a means of “explaining” or rationalizing downloads of projects. Who ends up invigilating what an “anomaly” is considered and could that extend to classifying fair or unfair downloads? Does this leave room for litigious banter. That’ll be tricky
Perfect. This is great!
I’m fine with this as long as they publish who reported the anomaly and why. If it’s public it’s maybe more likey to be scrutinized. Also the ability to toggle between the sanitized and raw charts is reasonable. The question is, how maintainable is this?
Shoot need tograb popcorn for this State of the Union. I have a feeling it’s going to be quite a show 😆
Katja, I'm sorry this is happening to you. Our whole community is behind you. If there's anything we can do please let me know. You're contribution and involvement and open-source is deeply appreciated. You're an integral part of what makes Solid so solid. 💙
Just dropped @solid-primitives/sse. A Solid Primitive for Server-Sent Events. I haven't been able to contribute in a while but it's time I get back to it. :)
github.com/solidjs-comm...
Well. Fuck. Haha
What? Seriously?!!!! How do you know this.
Oh yeah. Just have to keep the momentum and bring it home. If Crosby was playing this would be done.
What a traitor. Take his Order of Canada.
I feel like I’ve been having a heart attack for a whole 10 minutes!
It’s not hate at all. It’s deep concern for the US, for us, for North America. Whatever is happening is weakening all of us. There were better ways of adjusting and aligning things so we all benefit fairly.
