Yeah he's a really weird guy. Tried to do some double-fakeout "Oh this was written by AI lol fooled you" and then "and the AI was partially trained on my posts! DOUBLE FOOLED YOU" and all it managed to do was point out he had no clue out little influence he had over the model.
04.03.2026 22:06
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Notre Dame professor provides in-depth response to accusations of academic dishonesty when signing his name to AI-generated articles that misrepresent their citations:
04.03.2026 21:35
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Dude seems addicted to getting any form of attention he can.
He only blocked me after I pointed out the academic dishonesty of signing your name to AI-generated articles, and that the article misrepresents its source citation.
04.03.2026 21:34
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
It's like every option is bad: he's either a complete attention-troller, a moron that can't understand he's being mocked, or desperately trying to signal "I'm not mad, don't put in the newspaper I got mad"
04.03.2026 21:28
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
He really thought it was a dunk too. "WELL AKTUALLY the bot was trained on my social media posts!" like he thinks a few megabytes worth the text significantly sways terabytes of training data in the model.
04.03.2026 21:26
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Alexander actually reposted this, which seems to be a pattern. He liked the meme I posted making fun of him, but I guess pointing out the academic dishonesty of signing his name to articles he doesn't actually right made him angry enough to block me.
04.03.2026 21:24
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Listen up, Academia!
*Blocks everyone that disagrees with him*
04.03.2026 21:20
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Lmao he's not taking it well
04.03.2026 21:18
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Lmao he's blocked me
04.03.2026 21:15
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
His ai-generated article cites a paper as supporting his conclusion when it actively states the opposite.
It's as if relying on LLMs makes your brain atrophy.
04.03.2026 06:09
๐ 7
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
"I don't care if an important finding comes from a human or AI, as long as it's accurate. "
He says, after signing his name to an AI-generated article that falsely cites a paper as supporting LLMs in peer review.
04.03.2026 06:08
๐ 4
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Lmao someone else in the thread pointed out that the paper it cited literally concludes that human review absolutely shouldn't be automated away.
04.03.2026 05:58
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
Had people tell me the same thing about cryptocurrency and NFTs taking over.
03.03.2026 18:40
๐ 46
๐ 1
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
A barnacle on the side of the ship's rudder, assured that it's influencing the destination port.
03.03.2026 18:39
๐ 7
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
"Excel made this graph. It will replace me soon"
03.03.2026 18:21
๐ 1
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Sure, if we completely ignore that his entire take is a intellectually hollow justification for using hallucinatory mass plagiarism in academia.
He's supposed to represent the best values of his institution, not signing is name to an AI-generated article.
03.03.2026 18:20
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Meme featuring Bart and Homer. Bart is lablled as Alexander, saying chatbots do better academic research. Homer is correcting him that chatbots do better academic research than Alexander.
03.03.2026 18:18
๐ 21
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
>Brags about having Claude write the whole article
>Signs his name to it anyway
"I have the moral high ground to lecture academia!"
bsky.app/profile/3dbe...
03.03.2026 18:10
๐ 4
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
I'm not going to do 99.9% of the heavy lifting in a conversation just so some mediocre midwit can feel smart. They are not entitled to our time or attention.
03.03.2026 18:09
๐ 11
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
I've found AI bros have zero understanding of the concept of how unfair it is in a conversation to post big walls of AI text that other actual humans would have to read, think about, and write responses... only to immediately have another AI-generated novella sent back.
03.03.2026 18:08
๐ 15
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
"Notre Dame professor signs his name to articles generated by giant plagiarism machine"
03.03.2026 18:05
๐ 12
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 1
As someone in Canada, I can tell you most people that hate the healthcare system (in comparison to the US) are either so well-off they can afford to drop 10 grand to skip the line or they're woefully under-informed of the kafkaesque nightmare that is the US healthcare system.
01.03.2026 08:49
๐ 3
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Yeah, that was part of his spate of "if Obama did it I want to tear it down and do it 'better' " stomping fit
24.02.2026 22:36
๐ 2
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
I laughed a bit, if it helps
24.02.2026 08:25
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0
I don't think that's so much blaming the public than it is recognizing that the DOJ have lost the trust of the public, undermined their own credibility by engaging in partisan politics.
24.02.2026 08:21
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
The true lost technology of the ages: a menu that actually shows you the food they sell and what it costs.
17.02.2026 03:39
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
...yeah, kinda looks like the non-paying client had an axe to grind:
16.02.2026 22:31
๐ 0
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
Martin Luther King Jr. had some ever-green observations about people that supposedly support justice in society but wring their hands at anything mildly disruptive.
14.02.2026 18:42
๐ 9
๐ 0
๐ฌ 0
๐ 0
[...] the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who [..] says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"
14.02.2026 18:41
๐ 8
๐ 0
๐ฌ 1
๐ 0