No, they don't have to disprove shit. This is classic shifting the burden of proof fallacy.
If they want to make the positive claim -that a glorified text predictor is conscious- that's up to them to prove.
Yeah he's a really weird guy. Tried to do some double-fakeout "Oh this was written by AI lol fooled you" and then "and the AI was partially trained on my posts! DOUBLE FOOLED YOU" and all it managed to do was point out he had no clue out little influence he had over the model.
Notre Dame professor provides in-depth response to accusations of academic dishonesty when signing his name to AI-generated articles that misrepresent their citations:
Dude seems addicted to getting any form of attention he can.
He only blocked me after I pointed out the academic dishonesty of signing your name to AI-generated articles, and that the article misrepresents its source citation.
It's like every option is bad: he's either a complete attention-troller, a moron that can't understand he's being mocked, or desperately trying to signal "I'm not mad, don't put in the newspaper I got mad"
He really thought it was a dunk too. "WELL AKTUALLY the bot was trained on my social media posts!" like he thinks a few megabytes worth the text significantly sways terabytes of training data in the model.
Alexander actually reposted this, which seems to be a pattern. He liked the meme I posted making fun of him, but I guess pointing out the academic dishonesty of signing his name to articles he doesn't actually right made him angry enough to block me.
Listen up, Academia!
*Blocks everyone that disagrees with him*
Lmao he's not taking it well
Lmao he's blocked me
His ai-generated article cites a paper as supporting his conclusion when it actively states the opposite.
It's as if relying on LLMs makes your brain atrophy.
"I don't care if an important finding comes from a human or AI, as long as it's accurate. "
He says, after signing his name to an AI-generated article that falsely cites a paper as supporting LLMs in peer review.
Lmao someone else in the thread pointed out that the paper it cited literally concludes that human review absolutely shouldn't be automated away.
Had people tell me the same thing about cryptocurrency and NFTs taking over.
A barnacle on the side of the ship's rudder, assured that it's influencing the destination port.
"Excel made this graph. It will replace me soon"
Sure, if we completely ignore that his entire take is a intellectually hollow justification for using hallucinatory mass plagiarism in academia.
He's supposed to represent the best values of his institution, not signing is name to an AI-generated article.
Meme featuring Bart and Homer. Bart is lablled as Alexander, saying chatbots do better academic research. Homer is correcting him that chatbots do better academic research than Alexander.
>Brags about having Claude write the whole article
>Signs his name to it anyway
"I have the moral high ground to lecture academia!"
bsky.app/profile/3dbe...
I'm not going to do 99.9% of the heavy lifting in a conversation just so some mediocre midwit can feel smart. They are not entitled to our time or attention.
I've found AI bros have zero understanding of the concept of how unfair it is in a conversation to post big walls of AI text that other actual humans would have to read, think about, and write responses... only to immediately have another AI-generated novella sent back.
"Notre Dame professor signs his name to articles generated by giant plagiarism machine"
As someone in Canada, I can tell you most people that hate the healthcare system (in comparison to the US) are either so well-off they can afford to drop 10 grand to skip the line or they're woefully under-informed of the kafkaesque nightmare that is the US healthcare system.
Yeah, that was part of his spate of "if Obama did it I want to tear it down and do it 'better' " stomping fit
I laughed a bit, if it helps
I don't think that's so much blaming the public than it is recognizing that the DOJ have lost the trust of the public, undermined their own credibility by engaging in partisan politics.
The true lost technology of the ages: a menu that actually shows you the food they sell and what it costs.
...yeah, kinda looks like the non-paying client had an axe to grind:
Update: Looks like the whole thing came from someone seeing the posts and complaining. Police pressed charges, CPS dropped them.
Looking at the posts, looks like a whole fuss over nothing IMO.
www.snopes.com/news/2025/12...
Martin Luther King Jr. had some ever-green observations about people that supposedly support justice in society but wring their hands at anything mildly disruptive.
