Sharing some photos during my presentation at The Judicial Academy of the Philippines during the first human rights symposium hosted by the Supreme Court of the Philippines.

Photo credits to the SC PIO.

Thank you for this!

The statement is a textbook example of a malady that Filipino lawyers often suffer: an abundance of words and a paucity of meaning. Anyways, putting it as an example for next year’s Legal Writing course.

Hot take: Just read the statement by the Integrated Bar of the Philippines on the House kerfuffle involving “an individual who happens to be a lawyer.” (Their words, not mine)

I think the statement is not necessary. It was full of legalese without saying anything of substance.

Nice meeting you too, Ross! Mahaba-habang usapan next time!

Post a picture of yourself to show the newbies what they’re dealing with.

“The freedom to criticize judges and other public officials is necessary to a vibrant democracy.”

- Justice Sandra Day O’Connor

I couldn't help myself.

I was planning to subscribe sana just to see this. His podcast is at another level though!

Thanks for this @jcpunongbayan.bsky.social! Please include me too!

Yes. May comments ako pero it is a good way forward on the use of other methods for legal research

Justices and Political Loyalties: An Empirical Investigation of the Supreme Court of the Philippines, 1987–2020 | Law & Social Inquiry | Cambridge Core Justices and Political Loyalties: An Empirical Investigation of the Supreme Court of the Philippines, 1987–2020 - Volume 49 Issue 2

I read this one from Cristina and Bjoern. Quite interesting read.

“O quam cito transit gloria mundi” -Thomas à Kempis, The Imitation of Christ

Hello everyone!