- prompt adaptation capabilities with outstanding results for a Fortune 100 company
We’re now looking to fill three technical roles for building more and supporting our partners. If you want to build impactful #genai products see the link for more details.
notdiamond.notion.site/Not-Diamond-...
About to hit Year 1 building multi-model #generativeai on Not Diamond’s founding team, and we’re growing our technical staff during Year 2.
We’ve shipped
- a world-class router with SOTA performance,
- open-source, client-side fallback and reliability tools for scale-ups to larger enterprises,
AGI is ruined!!
But “meaningful [to the market]? when the market that has yet to see that threshold” assumes the question.
If you believe the market doesn’t want o1, and ask me to demonstrate otherwise, then I don’t have a shot at convincing you. Even if I point to multiple quarters of Meta’s earning calls, right?
Yeah that’s fair. At a minimum we’re seeing strong adoption (ranging from prototypes to production) across customer service contexts, data annotation / summarization, software development, and operational process automation.
Well clearly we’ve reached AGI here
😂
The spirit of Old Data Twitter is alive and kicking here 🥲
Strongly agreed. I’ve seen some embarrassing (at best!) medical failures from o1. machine-learning-made-simple.medium.com/openai-is-ly...
(I’m arguing from a perspective where (1) AGI claims are unrealistic, (2) most AI marketing deserves skepticism, and yet (3) we can still develop meaningful apps / workflows around these models.)
And you’re concluding this because of
> the researchers' hypothesis that LLMs look for patterns in reasoning problems, rather than innately understand the concept
right?
This is absolutely a failure from an AGI perspective. But could it be useful to identify generalized reasoning patterns?
I get it, my industry absolutely has a terrible track record with product hype. I personally hate it.
But the people I know engaging in this work *aren’t* the OAIs of the world. They’re uni lab startups quietly working with hospitals and researchers.
Hugs on your pops. That’s fucking terrible.
People are! And they’re fine-tuning models atop of Meta’s Llama etc to work with clinical notes and scans! But that’s way less exciting to talk about than OpenAI palace intrigue.
(From www.wheresyoured.at/subprimeai/ for context for others)
I’ll share one:
> “a big, stupid magic trick” in the form of OpenAI's (rushed) launch of its "o1 (codenamed: strawberry") model
You quoted yourself re: “a big, stupid magic trick.” So: why does o1 qualify as one?
No but seriously lol
IMO it depends on your goal as a media professional. “LLMs got my answers wrong so they’re bad” is both factually correct and superficial. You can certainly run that, or you can explore _why_ they’re wrong in order to enrich your findings.
