imagine learning to draw the fit of an ill fitting suit well, like a 150 jc penney slightly (but like only by 5lbs) too small but also weirdly boxy in other areas, with a polyester sheen
truth nuke sorry
in the last couple years ive started doing this way more often and its good
dead cells portmaster support...
Smile smile smuh Smile
Nancy 2/15/26 … presenting “My Daily Schedule”
Nancy 3/4/26 💅
2026 nuclear family meme— featuring Fritzi as Neurodivergent Aunt, Sluggo as Sluggo, Nancy as Daughter, Nancy Jr as Woke Dog
She just lost the primary— overwhelmingly— to this guy
New post!
Many Americans hold contradictory opinions on the same policies. Question wording effects can swing opinions by 20+ points on immigration, the budget, and transgender rights.
That's a problem for people who interpret polls for a living.
www.gelliottmorris.com/p/many-ameri...
A kinsey scale for gender would seriously rock some peoples world view like maybe you’re not a MAN™ you’re a Man✨ and thats okay but heaven fucking forbid we allow for Cis nuance it’ll make the frogs gay
Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York Estate of Karl Nierendorf, By purchase © 2016 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn
Horizon, Zenith and Atmosphere by Paul Klee, 1925
https://botfrens.com/collections/212/contents/137349
Those three US jet fighters shot down this morning cost more than the entire annual budget of the National Endowment for the Humanities
aka fucking to brian eno / laraaji
what parts of wikipedia just suck you in for hours?
for me, anything related to linguistics or geography or the intersection of those things does it
It’s funny if you call PayPal or visa lines and bring this up asking why they claim “adult illustrations” is against their regulations but betting on the death of kids is totally fine. They don’t have an answer.
In fact yall should call them at least once a day with this :)
I hope you aren’t drunk and took your staff’s advice, Rashida and I don’t know this man and feel confident he didn’t care about us. Please restrain from drinking too much as you have been warned from your staff and stay off social media when you are drunk. I pray in his holy month you find peace and respect for your self,
uhhh oh my god
There's this quote from the graffiti from the 1968 protests in France that goes, "you will die of comfort" and in my 20s I thought that quote was so true, but lately I've been thinking what's more accurate is, "you will die from politeness"
Furry world trend where dragons and birds popularize walking everywhere because a fitness podcast fed people the idea that using your wings less makes your life longer
And an Influencer said that they only fly in clean air
![why do furries relitigate the same handful of moral panics? this is an interesting question to ponder, and many possibilities present themselves. furries are young and opinionated; furries believe themselves culturally and sexually challenging in a way that invites theorycrafting and moralizing; furry subculture is in many ways a ‘train station’ where people endlessly come and go, so there is never a baseline and never a settled consensus. all quite reasonable, all likely contributors. you may feel though, as i do, that these explanations dance around the core of what is happening here—they justify the recurrence, explain the severity, but do not get at what the purpose is exactly of these feverish bursts of discourse. in this vein i have a simple theory: these are essentially ideological confrontations and should be understood as such.
what validates this simple theory of mine is the pathology of the furry moral panic and how little it diverges from what we see in the real world. just as can be observed of a real world moral panic, we see in the furry moral panic a predictable tendency to “[play] on themes which possess deeper, unconscious resonances” that any decent person ought find monstrous—so against the babyfur one is rattled with the specter of normalized pedophilia and child abuse, and against the feral artist one is assaulted with the prospect of covert zoophilic tendencies or rape of animals. and there is always some moral panic, always some subject who must be driven out of the subculture in the name of ‘standards’ which must be ‘put beyond debate.’
but never is the question evoked by this answered—what standard of decency is being applied, and on whose behalf?—because answering it would reveal ideology, make clear that the furry moral panic acts in reality as a site of struggle between those who demand assimilation and those who do not. the moral panic itself, then...](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:6aybno3ecyn6tt5mzjqncsmg/bafkreigyg2ejhwrdfavv3qbcn5bnpxjlbpu37a4lmxs2ynpw57gkoofhuu)
why do furries relitigate the same handful of moral panics? this is an interesting question to ponder, and many possibilities present themselves. furries are young and opinionated; furries believe themselves culturally and sexually challenging in a way that invites theorycrafting and moralizing; furry subculture is in many ways a ‘train station’ where people endlessly come and go, so there is never a baseline and never a settled consensus. all quite reasonable, all likely contributors. you may feel though, as i do, that these explanations dance around the core of what is happening here—they justify the recurrence, explain the severity, but do not get at what the purpose is exactly of these feverish bursts of discourse. in this vein i have a simple theory: these are essentially ideological confrontations and should be understood as such. what validates this simple theory of mine is the pathology of the furry moral panic and how little it diverges from what we see in the real world. just as can be observed of a real world moral panic, we see in the furry moral panic a predictable tendency to “[play] on themes which possess deeper, unconscious resonances” that any decent person ought find monstrous—so against the babyfur one is rattled with the specter of normalized pedophilia and child abuse, and against the feral artist one is assaulted with the prospect of covert zoophilic tendencies or rape of animals. and there is always some moral panic, always some subject who must be driven out of the subculture in the name of ‘standards’ which must be ‘put beyond debate.’ but never is the question evoked by this answered—what standard of decency is being applied, and on whose behalf?—because answering it would reveal ideology, make clear that the furry moral panic acts in reality as a site of struggle between those who demand assimilation and those who do not. the moral panic itself, then...
...can be understood as a reflection of anxiety about diversity—especially of an avant garde variety—and the inherent difficulty in liquidating this diversity to the desired ‘decency’ and ‘normality.’ furries also seem rather predictable moralizers in this respect; it is typical of those who seek fealty to polite society to frame their desires “in the name of the ‘good’ of a population which is never actually consulted.” to be clear, i should not be interpreted as suggesting it surprising that furry subculture fails to subvert the totality of one's socialization, or the cultural hegemony of one's media consumption. nevertheless, it makes for a rather schizoid scene (if i may be permitted to use the term) for some to find gratification in ordinary furry porn—much less in transformation, inflation, vore and such—but then turn back on it the moral framework and prescriptions of a society that would struggle to distinguish any of it from actual zoophilic desire. if in the framework of polite society we are all dogfuckers, yet we all know this is false, even from a perspective of bad faith it seems rather worth questioning the value of this framework in making social condemnations of other furries. certainly you will not manage to become some hypothetical ‘good dogfucker’ by passing such judgements, by attempting to use the logic of the moral panic to browbeat the subculture into your desired form. the audience to whose tune you are ultimately trying to dance already knows what to think of you. they have already devised the moral framework needed to permanently otherize you, and all you have done is internalize their logic to otherize your own acceptable targets. ultimately, to appeal to ‘decency’ can play only to the advantage of one side, and that side is Watney's “imaginary national family unit which is both white and heterosexual” for whom only the total renunciation of queer identity is acceptable. it is, in a sense, an appeal to collaboration.
a theory on the recurrent furry moral panic (or, ‘the haunt of the ideological confrontation’)
alyaza.neocities.org/essays/Furry...
I had forgotten how The Simpsons put the extra effort in to flip this joke. Rather than just satirizing US nationalist parochialism, Homer is (momentarily) an expert on Iranian politics.
The most oppressed group of all: French-Canadians
did you know? the "q" in lgbtq stands for "quebec"
💙💚⭐🐾✨
#furryart #furrycommissions
like, this is great! deserves more than 500 plays www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGE1...
never heard of this band before today, but this 2019 ep is really neat. deliberate combination of panda bear-style harmonic psychedelia with a cumbia rythym backing it. great stuff, well worth a listen
franciscoymadero.bandcamp.com/album/--2
he can feel woke 2 coming like a rainstorm in a bad knee
Correct. Still true today of the parasocial relationships people have with YouTubers and podcasters! bsky.app/profile/amat...
A thing I strongly believe, but that was only obvious in retrospect, was that drive-time talk radio was the most valuable propaganda platform in history and a big reason we got into this mess we're in now was because conservatives dominated it in the 1990s and 2000s
zohran mamdani: honey, for the good of new york city i have to humor an senile fascist that has a homosexual attraction towards me. is this ok?
rama duwaji: zohran what the fuck are you talking about
