Jacob Reed - ReviewEcon.com's Avatar

Jacob Reed - ReviewEcon.com

@reviewecon.com

http://ReviewEcon.com creator and AP economics teacher tweeting about microeconomics and macroeconomics. #apmicro, #apmacro

275
Followers
1,283
Following
24
Posts
05.09.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Jacob Reed - ReviewEcon.com @reviewecon.com

Post image

This is not good.

06.03.2026 13:40 πŸ‘ 8998 πŸ” 3503 πŸ’¬ 718 πŸ“Œ 451
Video thumbnail

Quick reax to SCOTUS ruling Trump's tariffs illegal.

20.02.2026 17:35 πŸ‘ 1557 πŸ” 559 πŸ’¬ 93 πŸ“Œ 44

It's hard to believe that you could be the trade representative for a major power and not know that tariffs are regressive.

My econ 101 students know what the word regressive means, and that tariffs are regressive. Many could even cite studies on the subject.

18.02.2026 02:50 πŸ‘ 3151 πŸ” 779 πŸ’¬ 224 πŸ“Œ 29

Great explanation for Gen Ed econ students! I'll use this in my classes. Thank you!

31.01.2026 07:13 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

93% of economists polled by IGM markets earlier this year agreed that "Giving the President more direct influence over monetary policy would lead to substantially worse monetary policy decisions", half of the people who disagreed were people who actually agreed but just pressed the wrong button

12.01.2026 01:34 πŸ‘ 332 πŸ” 70 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 2
Post image

Since a perfect price discriminating monopoly charges all prices along the demand curve (until the MR=MC quantity), this giant triangle is the producer surplus. Note: I drew a linear MC to make it easier, and I expect they would do that if this was on the AP exam. I hope that helps!

09.01.2026 16:17 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Producer surplus is the difference between the price of each unit and the MC of producing that unit. That's why we get that giant triangle. No consumer surplus when a monopoly perfectly price discriminates.

09.01.2026 16:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Who’s eating the tariffs? You, mostly.

@cnbc.com
www.cnbc.com/2025/10/16/t...

16.10.2025 19:53 πŸ‘ 4897 πŸ” 1950 πŸ’¬ 163 πŸ“Œ 96
Post image

Trump's CEA is circulating its estimate of the economic cost of the government shutdown.

But, BREAKING: It's wrong. It makes a simple arithmetic error. And it's dishonest.

Surprising, I know. 🧡

02.10.2025 18:04 πŸ‘ 1095 πŸ” 461 πŸ’¬ 22 πŸ“Œ 39

Hey, so I'm doing this thing next week, and it's a pilot for what I'm hoping will be a regular thing, and I'm really excited about it, and I do hope you'll join us.

Signup here: myumi.ch/G2dZ7

24.09.2025 21:26 πŸ‘ 245 πŸ” 77 πŸ’¬ 10 πŸ“Œ 1

Think of an economy as like baking a cake. H1-B visas exist so that if you're out of a specific ingredient, you can Instacart it and keep baking. Add a $100k delivery charge and you'll choose to:
1. Quit baking; or
2. Use an inferior recipe; or
3. Import cake instead of making it

20.09.2025 23:06 πŸ‘ 1291 πŸ” 327 πŸ’¬ 64 πŸ“Œ 10

Fed statement makes it official: Stagflation is in the room.

"Job gains have slowed, and the unemployment rate has edged up... Inflation has moved up and remains somewhat elevated. "

17.09.2025 18:10 πŸ‘ 773 πŸ” 281 πŸ’¬ 38 πŸ“Œ 32
Post image

The labor market continues to soften, according to the latest #JobsReport out this morning from the BLS. Payroll employment grew only 22,000 in August and revisions now show employment losses for June (-13,000). Over the last three months, job growth has slowed to just 29,000 on average.
#EconSky

05.09.2025 12:41 πŸ‘ 75 πŸ” 42 πŸ’¬ 7 πŸ“Œ 8
Post image

mood

14.06.2025 20:30 πŸ‘ 9114 πŸ” 1311 πŸ’¬ 255 πŸ“Œ 147

So excited I got to meet @justinwolfers.bsky.social at the AP reading last night after he gave a very interesting presentation on the economics of AI. He was extremely generous with his time and stayed late to answer questions. Thank you Dr. Wolfers!

05.06.2025 21:30 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Lemme explain what bilateral trade deficits are, so that you can better understand -- and perhaps be infuriated by -- the intellectual error that's transforming our economy. #TeachEcon

26.05.2025 23:19 πŸ‘ 1148 πŸ” 418 πŸ’¬ 41 πŸ“Œ 41

Good news: April CPI came out slightly better than expected.

Overall CPI rose 0.2% last month, and is up 2.3% over the year.

Core CPI also rose 0.2%, but is up 2.8% over the year.

So far, inflation remains on a reasonable trajectory, although we know there are shocks in store.

13.05.2025 12:39 πŸ‘ 283 πŸ” 32 πŸ’¬ 21 πŸ“Œ 2
a timeline of Trump's 2nd-term tariffs, which go from roughly 2.5% to 13% by march, fall back to 7%, rise to 10%, rise to 15%, rise to 28%, sink to 25%, rise to 26%, then fall to 16%

a timeline of Trump's 2nd-term tariffs, which go from roughly 2.5% to 13% by march, fall back to 7%, rise to 10%, rise to 15%, rise to 28%, sink to 25%, rise to 26%, then fall to 16%

The 90-day pause on China tariffs is the largest reduction in tariffs since Trump took office, by far, but it still leaves tariffs significantly higher than they were on April 2nd and eight times as high as before he took office

12.05.2025 13:14 πŸ‘ 398 πŸ” 127 πŸ’¬ 15 πŸ“Œ 11
Video thumbnail

Day one of Econ 101: Opportunity cost matters.
Alcatraz brings in $60M/year from tourism.
Trump wants to shut it down to house 300 inmatesβ€”that’s a hidden cost of $200K per prisoner.
That’s not tough on crime; it's failing the midterm. #TeachEcon

10.05.2025 16:34 πŸ‘ 504 πŸ” 127 πŸ’¬ 20 πŸ“Œ 5

It's bad.

08.05.2025 05:53 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
2025 Microeconomics FRQ Set 1 Unboxing - Answers! (Best Guess)
2025 Microeconomics FRQ Set 1 Unboxing - Answers! (Best Guess) YouTube video by ReviewEcon

Here are my best guess answers for this year's AP micro FRQs. Good luck to your students on Macro! πŸ˜„

Set 1: youtu.be/OvJEPCXj5xo

Set 2: youtu.be/kn2DLa5_0Tc

08.05.2025 03:13 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Phew.

Payrolls grew a relatively uninteresting (and positive!) +177k in April, and unemployment was unchanged at 4.2%.

This economy is still humming along.

NOTE: This is a reading largely from the pre-tariff period. Still very foggy about what lies ahead.

02.05.2025 12:30 πŸ‘ 766 πŸ” 82 πŸ’¬ 51 πŸ“Œ 9

It just started because the parcel exemption for tariffs that allowed Temu to sidestep them ends 5/2.

28.04.2025 22:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's real, I canceled an order from TEMU yesterday when I saw the >100% import charge.

28.04.2025 19:45 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

And good luck to your students on this year's exam!

25.04.2025 16:51 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, the point of that question is that if an item has a positive price, that indicates the product is scarce (because the resources used to make it are also scarce). Essentially, items that are plentiful at a positive price, will still see a shortage at a price of $0. I hope that helps!

25.04.2025 16:50 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Hop-portunity costs, tariffs, and bunny suit economics.

20.04.2025 19:31 πŸ‘ 422 πŸ” 81 πŸ’¬ 15 πŸ“Œ 12
Preview
Ironically, Because Of All The New Tariffs, It's Now Way Cheaper To Make Our Chocolate Bars Outside The US,' Says MrBeast YouTuber and entrepreneur Jimmy Donaldson, known as MrBeast, isn't shy about calling out policies that don’t make sense, especially when they affect his growing business. In a viral post on Tuesday, h...

Interesting example regarding the downside of tariffs. If you've got Mr. Beast fans in your class, you might get extra buy in.

finance.yahoo.com/news/ironica...

16.04.2025 22:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

Economics might seem -- from the outside -- like it's about competition. But really it's about creating the miracle of cooperation, where folks from all around the world enrich your day in a million tiny ways. It's that beauty that I'm worried about losing.

11.04.2025 22:16 πŸ‘ 340 πŸ” 77 πŸ’¬ 19 πŸ“Œ 8

As an AP economics teacher, I find your work extremely helpful. Just wanted to let you know.

10.04.2025 21:24 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0