I'm OK with Science, as an ideology.
Science didn't trigger many wars so far.
@grace2002
Please don't base your opinion regarding the origins of COVID19 on your political affiliation. Many biologists agree, privately, that the lab leak hypothesis is the most compatible with the principle of parsimony. Blocking posters restricting reply rights.
I'm OK with Science, as an ideology.
Science didn't trigger many wars so far.
I dropped after "in the interest of peace".
That's a Jewish myth before it was adopted by the Christians.
Remember the first Christians were just yet another Jewish splinter group.
The jews needed this myth because they were colonized by the Romans, after having been dominated by the Persians (... today's Iran).
So nothing new here.
The big deal is you were wrong stating that EPR was good.
I'm not getting in the particulars.
I just proved you wrong. With data.
Trump: "Ni hao Comrade Xi, can I haz rare earths pleaz?"
Xi: "Sure, what for?"
Trump: "I need Raytheon to make more 4M$ patriot missiles to shoot down these pesky 30k$ Shahed drones!"
Xi: "Bao qian, lao Trump, unfortunately, the dog ate my notebook, I can't remember where my rare earths are now!"
Trump: "Ni hao Comrade Xi, can I haz rare earths pleaz?"
Xi: "Sure, what for?"
Trump: "I need Raytheon to make more 4M$ patriot missiles to shoot down these pesky 30k$ Shahed drones!"
Xi: "Bao qian, lao Trump, unfortunately, the dog ate my notebook, I can't remember where my rare earths are now!"
Trump: "Ni hao Comrade Xi, can I haz rare earths pleaz?"
Xi: "Sure, what for?"
Trump: "I need Raytheon to make more 4M$ patriot missiles to shoot down these pesky 30k$ Shahed drones!"
Xi: "Bao qian, lao Trump, unfortunately, the dog ate my notebook, I can't remember where my rare earths are now!"
"The tragic love story between Jack and Rose was built on luxurious travel, raucous parties, and secret nude sketches. This monument honors the bond between Donald Trump & Jeffrey Epstein, a friendship seemingly built on luxurious travel, raucous parties, & secret nude sketches'
ππ to these artists
Best scenario,
Trump gets rid of the Iranian regime and Iran gets rid of Trump and Bibi.
Irish coins of different sizes, showing a horse, salmon, bull, hare, hound, hen, pig and woodcock
In 1926, as a member of the Irish Senate, W.B. Yeats enthusiastically took charge of the committee designing new coinage for the Irish Free State. Yeats decided the different denominations should be symbolised by different animals (was he consciously thinking of this as the βtailsβ side?) 1/2
Then we agree.
Here is what I wrote earlier: "Yes subsidies are necessary to create a market and displace long established technologies benefiting from scale effect and decades of technical improvement."
It's like helping mammals compete with dinosaurs before the K-T transition. It's justifiable.
Don't say "No" when you don't contradict anything I wrote.
Yes German subsidies started the GERMAN market (ONLY) on the DEMAND side.
But China addressed the GLOBAL market starting in the 2000s.
They became significantly cheaper than German ones because of their own Chinese COMPETITIVE market.
There *is* competition.
You can see it on wholesale markets such as EPEX.
It's enabled by entso-e's grid.
At the national level, competition is enforced by the Merit Order Model and Marginal Pricing (taking the most expensive of the least costly power generation sources in a given forecast period).
Competition is ALWAYS good. It's a universal truth.
Examples abound, in linguistics, in evolutionary biology, and economics.
It is the mechanism by which existing entities adapt to changing environments.
DNA mutations are not the result of elections but of selections.
You're shooting yourself in the foot here.
PV is cheap thanks to China, and Chinese PV is cheap because of competition.
Yes subsidies are necessary to create a market and displace long established technologies benefiting from scale effect and decades of technical improvement.
But that's demand side.
True. Residential PV solar power generation is a good incentive to improve the grid.
Developing economies benefit from this trend by skipping the old heavily hierarchical grid model built for the centralized NPP model.
Smoothing demand peaks, reduced transmission losses and lowering grid stress.
"availability" ?
bsky.app/profile/grac...
"The new EPR has been very successful for a new unit"
Examples?
- Flamanville III?
- Hinkley Point C?
- Olkiluoto 3?
Are these "successes" in your book?
And do you work in sales?
Do you tell your clients "don't buy my stuff"?
Germany has > 100 GW installed capacity (utility) and PV is not a good solution for Europe?
Also, believe it or not, randomness is good.
It is an opportunity to pivot to the Green H2 society and address *ALL* GHG emissions.
Because nuke is too expensive, takes decades to plug into the grid. Because its wastes last for millennia. Because its way too complex. Because only developed countries can afford it. Because it needs a hierarchical unidirectional grid. Because its a single point of failure.
Among other things.
Correct. You can't blink when you're dead.
Is it abandoned or is it with nanny?
It can't be both.
tl;dr: US SUN = SHIT TABLOID
Solar works well in winter too.
You just need more surface area. That's all.
And there is more wind.
Same for the day. There is more wind at night.
So, try harder, nuke bro.
So in your world, there is no wind in winter?
Check again.
China is betting on storage today. By the time Europe roll out their first SMR, cheap storage solutions will be mainstream.
Trivia: the higher the number of nuclear reactors, the higher the probability of mishap.
blog.ucs.org/edwin-lyman/...
How boring!
You are at level 0 of understanding the energy market.
- Large NPP (>1GW) need 10y at least to become operational.
- SMRs are twice as costly at least (per GW) than already costly classic EPRs.
So, back to the drawing board.
Because in 10y time, storage and green H2 will be mainstream.
Looks familiar...
Crash amplifier.