Kieran's Avatar

Kieran

@kieran.co.uk

Developer, drinks too much coffee, and loves data.

385
Followers
196
Following
634
Posts
16.04.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Kieran @kieran.co.uk

Being using Claude for some frontend stuff to speed up the process for UI, on the pro plan, I always max out their usage really quickly..... is this normal? Seems very little you get.

09.12.2025 13:26 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I can do this from my Home app on Mac

07.12.2025 00:08 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

oh oh

06.12.2025 23:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

oh

06.12.2025 23:39 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Bluesky supporting Twitch live integration? Hmmmm

06.12.2025 22:16 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

would you recommend resetting SSH keys? I saw a blog write about it and it mentioned about SSH keys, so unsure.

06.12.2025 21:03 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Critical Security Vulnerability in React Server Components – React The library for web and native user interfaces

Update folks, just done my two sites!

06.12.2025 20:59 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

A pre-authentication remote code execution vulnerability exists in React Server Components versions 19.0.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 - not great!!!!! Update folks. www.cve.org/CVERecord?id...

06.12.2025 12:49 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

christ

01.12.2025 23:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

morning

29.11.2025 00:06 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

bluesky moderation strikes again

08.11.2025 18:32 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Good morning

18.10.2025 09:11 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

My weekly task is checking out @aendra.com to see what new task she’s working on and it always seems to be something productive and impressive.

18.10.2025 00:13 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

They removed the flag lol

18.10.2025 00:05 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah if I knew the whole of the White House was gonna get verified tonight I would have temp turned it off πŸ˜‚

18.10.2025 00:00 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

There are lots of ways to solve it and I’m surprised it’s been forgotten about. Twitter did similar about 5 years ago, allowed accounts to apply for bot status to lift limits and avoid false flags.

17.10.2025 23:55 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It’s been lifted thankfully, no email to say that though. Discord require full verification for bots like this, I wouldn’t mind doing it, if it would prevent issues like this. Doing that step tells discord your product isn’t going to be used in a spammy way, but even the header is a good idea.

17.10.2025 23:54 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

In blueskys defence likely automated and the flag has been lifted, whomever that was, thank you. I obviously don’t want to be getting any flags so please be open with us devs, clearly this isn’t a spam account, so justice has prevailed, quickly in my case. πŸ‘πŸ»

17.10.2025 23:52 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Or perhaps there could be up front community engagement with active developers on here with best practices on how to avoid this. From reading terms of service it’s a false flag. But yes a long term solution needs to be done asap due to the constant growth of products we all create

17.10.2025 23:45 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I did they came back 5 mins later with a ridiculous reply, see thread. I already have anti spam rules on, I store data in my db to prevent duplicate posts etc. all it does is follow any time verification takes place and posts, like that is so mild to compared to other services / accounts on here.

17.10.2025 23:43 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I mean it’s nothing offensive tagging a user unless the post was insulting etc, such an odd odd way to behave. I did see another dev get hit with something similar last week.

17.10.2025 23:41 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, if you have two mins and check how ridiculous this thread is. @aaron.bsky.team

17.10.2025 23:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I’ll probably just kill my server myself before they do that, fuck them.

17.10.2025 23:35 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Just another push back for open development on this platform, target innovative innocent accounts that have been running for months without issue. Bluesky moderation is really trying to kill its own PDS for sure.

17.10.2025 23:31 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Honestly it is. Wild. I already have a journalist emailing me from seeing this post πŸ˜‚ either that reply is AI or someone is working while intoxicated

17.10.2025 23:25 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Their reply. Wtf. Baffled.

17.10.2025 23:22 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

@jay.bsky.team we really need to have the option to label accounts as bots to avoid this. Especially considering neither has the account done any of this. It follows on average a few people a day when a verification is issued.

17.10.2025 23:19 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

@whiteside.io looks like I’m now targeted

17.10.2025 23:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Honestly it’s ridiculous, myself and others are pretty much being discouraged creating products with atprotocol because of issues like this. cc @esb.lol @pfrazee.com

17.10.2025 23:14 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Bluesky moderation quite poor, @verifiedusers.bsky.social wrongly flagged for spam. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

17.10.2025 23:09 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 4 πŸ“Œ 1