Our article on intervention factors associated with comprehension intervention efficacy has had over 1000 views, yay!
Have you read it yet?
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
Thank you, Jo! 😊 It does feel good to be at this point.
Thank you @carolynhondo.bsky.social! 😊
Thank you @suze-freogirl.bsky.social! 😊
I hope that the results of this work will provide support for choosing appropriate intervention methods and provide considerations for the development of clinical work that speech and language therapists constantly do.
Professor Cristina McKean, Professor Suvi Stolt and PhD Researcher Sirpa Tarvainen standing on the podium of the Small Hall at the Main building of the University of Helsinki at the beginning of the doctoral defence.
Professor Cristina McKean from the University of Oxford acted as the opponent and Professor Suvi Stolt from the University of Helsinki as the custos.
I defended my doctoral dissertation 'Oral language comprehension interventions for children with or at risk for (Developmental) Language Disorder and factors associated with their efficacy' on 21.11. at the University of Helsinki.
The dissertation can be read here: helda.helsinki.fi/items/182927...
Connect with the Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) community on BlueSky with our #DevLangDis start pack.
go.bsky.app/FMV4dou
If you're not listed and think you should be, then message us.
Help us reach a bigger audience by sharing this post also
Now open access:
Intervention factors associated with efficacy, when targeting oral language comprehension of children with or at risk for (Developmental) Language Disorder: A meta-analysis
#DevLangDis #WeSpeechies #SLP #SLT #SLPeeps #slp2be
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
🆓🔓 in @ashajournals.bsky.social van Witteloostuijn, M., Haggiyannes, A., de Bree, E., & Blom, E. (2025). Parental Input and Its Relationship With Language Outcomes in Children With (Suspected) #DevLangDis A Systematic Review. JSLHR, 68(4), 1982–2005. doi.org/10.1044/2024...
🦋 #bskySPEECHIES
Thank you, this link works!
The link doesn’t seem to work.
My colleagues at IALP are undertaking a study of digital literacy for speech pathologists. Please see below for details.
redcap.link/a7g1kcxg
@mwslp.bsky.social
Thank you Kate! 😊
Marilyn Nippold and Erin Marr created a language arts program, named, 'Philosophy for Adolescents' + it's available entirely FREE from here: asha.figshare.com/articles/onl...
#DLD #DevelopmentalLanguageDisorder #WeSpeechies
Thank you very much Lindsey!
Thank you Lesley!
Thank you Jo! 😊
Thank you Tamara! 😊
Thank you Stephen! 😊
This meta-analysis may be of interest to you
@theinformedslp.bsky.social @frickesilke.bsky.social @salonikrishnan.bsky.social @logopedie.bsky.social @hazelroddam.bsky.social @jititterington.bsky.social @tkalan.bsky.social @edldproject.bsky.social
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
This meta-analysis may be of interest to you @kateshobbrook.bsky.social @cristina-mckean.bsky.social @susanebbels.bsky.social @suze-freogirl.bsky.social @juliastarling.bsky.social @deevybee.bsky.social @naplic.bsky.social @radld.bsky.social
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
This meta-analysis provides clinicians factors to consider, but further research with larger data sets regarding factors contributing to efficacy is still needed before applying these results confidently to clinical practice.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
In this data, both the content and the intervention hours varied. The association of given intervention hours and effect sizes was marginal, indicating that the content of the intervention appears to affect efficacy more than the number of intervention hours.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Although children of different ages can benefit from interventions to enhance oral language comprehension, the child’s age needs to be carefully considered to develop interventions that are optimal.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
The interventions differed according to age: interventions for older (8–13y) children were more targeted, adult-directed, applied in formal activities, used taught strategies and more explicit methods of instruction compared to younger (2–7y) children.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Targeting solely receptive language was associated with larger effect sizes than targeting both receptive and expressive language. If aiming to support solely comprehension, targeting receptive l. rather than both r&e l. seems preferable to maximize efficacy.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Interventions targeting language processing, such as auditory processing or automatization, indicated no clinically significant efficacy, whereas targeting language, language environment, or teaching compensatory strategies indicated efficacy.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Oral language comprehension skills of children with or at risk for (D)LD can be supported.
Age was not associated with efficacy, indicating that 2–13-year-old children can benefit from comprehension interventions regardless of their age.
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
New research on intervention factors associated with efficacy in comprehension interventions.
Authors @sirpatarvainen.bsky.social, @pfrizelleslt.bsky.social, Granroth-Wilding, H., Stolt, S., & Launonen, K.
doi.org/10.1111/1460...
To be read here: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/author...